Gender and Job Role Congruence: A Field Study of Trust in Labor Mediators

Abstract

The extent to which individuals are seen as fulfilling their social roles is related to the extent they are seen as successful in that role. Using social role theory, the congruence of job roles and gender roles was examined among labor mediators, a profession requiring both agentic and communal characteristics. A total of 362 employees and employers involved in a workplace dispute that went to governmental mediation were recruited in Quebec, Canada. Regression analyses assessed how impartiality and empathy contributed to parties' trust in their mediators for male and female mediators. Comparisons of regression structures suggest that perceptions of gender incongruent job characteristics were better predictors of trust in the mediator than gender congruent characteristics. Theoretical and applied implications are discussed.

Another Test of Gender Differences in Assignments to Precarious Leadership Positions: Examining the Moderating Role of Ambivalent Sexism

“…Job roles are gendered in nature and viewed as more appropriate for men or women (Garcia‐Retamero & López‐Zafra ; Glick, Wilk, & Perreault, ; Heilman, ; Stulmacher & Poitras, ). Accordingly, successful performance of a job role is perceived to require agentic or communal behaviours (Heilman, ).…”

Factors Relating to Managerial Stereotypes: The Role of Gender of the Employee and the Manager and Management Gender Ratio

“…For female managers there is a clear incongruity between their gender role and the managerial role (Eagly and Carli 2007; Stuhlmacher and Poitras 2010). This incongruity leads to negative evaluations of female managers (Johnson et al 2008).…”

Social Capital, Homophily Ties and Networking Modes: A Gendered Approach to Ceos Evaluations of Organizational Performance

“…Here it is possible that women who engage in networking may have higher expectations of their effect on organizational performance than these networks actually have. Another possibility is that women place less trust in networking than men (Stuhlmacher & Poitras, 2010) due to their potential to cause harm and women's avoidance of risk-taking supporting the conclusions of recentstudies (Provan, Fish & Sydow, 2007). There is also the possibility that such gender differences reflect the level of success in obtaining information concerning economic, social and legal aspects from other CEOs.…”

“…Generalized and gendered conceptualizations of differences between men and women CEOs has been strongly opposed (Stuhlmacher & Poitras, 2010). Recent studies support the notion that gender "identities" and "subjectivities" are too diverse to be catalogued as uniform and theoretically valid.…”