Gender-Related Differences in the Citation Impact of Scientific Publications and Improving the Authors’ Productivity

Kuchansky, Alexander; Andrashko, Yurii; Biloshchytskyi, Andrii; Omirbayev, Serik; Mukhatayev, Aidos; Biloshchytska, Svitlana; Faizullin, Adil

doi:10.3390/publications11030037

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As noted below, in our modelling we weighted the uncertainty of the predicted gender using the probability score. The genderize.io API has been widely used in gender-related analyses in areas such as peer review (Fox et al 2016;Fox & Paine 2019;Kiang et al 2022), citation impact of scientific publications by author teams of different gender compositions (Kuchanskyi et al 2023) and authorship in journals of various fields, including medicine (Batumalai et al 2023;DeFilippis et al 2021;Gadek et al 2022;Hart & Perlis 2021) and seismology (Ermert et al 2023).…”

Section: Aim and Research Questionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Women are awarded more team grants than solo grants and lead more gender-balanced teams than men

Kingsley,

Slavich,

Harvey-Smith

et al. 2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We modelled patterns of collaboration, team gender composition, and funding amounts across awarded Australian government-funded competitive team research grants from 2000–2020. Among mid- and senior-career researchers, the percentage of grants awarded to women was higher for team grants than sole investigator grants compared to men at those levels. Teams led by women tended to have a greater percentage of women co-investigators than teams led by men, but this was below gender parity regardless of team leader gender. Funding amounts per grant did not differ by principal investigator gender and reached parity in 2020 across teams with both high and low representation of women. Since teams tend to be more gender-balanced when led by women, women’s grant leadership may be an important mechanism for shifting overall representation of women in research. We offer public policy measures to address gender equities in the research sector.

show abstract

Section: Aim and Research Questionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Women are awarded more team grants than solo grants and lead more gender-balanced teams than men

Kingsley,

Slavich,

Harvey-Smith

et al. 2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Unification of Methods for Reflecting and Analyzing Scientists’ Performance Indicators

Kolesnikova,

Kolesnikov,

Khikmetov

et al. 2024

Procedia Computer Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Gender differences in research fields of bioeconomy and rural development-based on sustainable systems in Latin America and Africa regions

Olivo,

Oluwakemi,

Lakner

et al. 2024

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Using bibliometric analysis of large-scale publication data is a simple approach to exploring gender-related trends, especially gender equality in academic publishing. The aim of this study is to investigate gender trends in the fields of bio-economy and rural development sciences in two under develop regions as Latin America and Africa. This study examines gender differences in these fields in order to: (1) recognize the contribution of female researchers in bioeconomy and rural development, (2) explore the relational structure of gender aspects in academic publications, (3) identify trends in female authorship in these scientific research fields over time, and finally (4) identify gender potentials for women to become more visible in these fields of study. To achieve these objectives, we used bibliometric tools to analyses 1891 publication records in bioeconomy and rural development. After cleaning the database of full names of authors of academic publications relevant to the field studies, we performed a series of statistical analyses in R and SPSS software, such as Lotkas distribution, network analysis, co-authorship analysis and spatial distribution of authors in the study. The results show that the number of male authors is almost three times higher than the number of female authors, suggesting that women are under-represented in the fields studied. Men occupy the most important position of authorship in scientific articles; publications with corresponding male authors were found in 1389 out of 1891 publications related to the bio-economy and rural development. In terms of geographical regions, publications with female authors were more prevalent in European and North American areas, with a small exception in some developing countries such as Argentina and South Africa. In terms of research networks, from the total number of authors evaluated, only 23% are female authors on the map of research influence. This indicates that there is a significant gap to be filled in the promotion of scholarly impact through the sharing of knowledge and expertise among authors.

show abstract

Gender-Related Differences in the Citation Impact of Scientific Publications and Improving the Authors’ Productivity

Cited by 3 publications

References 32 publications

Women are awarded more team grants than solo grants and lead more gender-balanced teams than men

Women are awarded more team grants than solo grants and lead more gender-balanced teams than men

Unification of Methods for Reflecting and Analyzing Scientists’ Performance Indicators

Gender differences in research fields of bioeconomy and rural development-based on sustainable systems in Latin America and Africa regions

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About