Gene expression profiling in aggressive digital papillary adenocarcinoma sheds light on the architecture of a rare sweat gland carcinoma

Abstract

Background Sweat gland carcinomas are rare cutaneous adnexal malignancies. Aggressive digital papillary adenocarcinoma (ADPA) represents a very rare subentity, thought to arise almost exclusively from the sweat glands of the fingers and toes. The aetiology of sweat gland carcinomas and ADPA is largely unknown. ADPAs are most likely driven by somatic mutations. However, somatic mutation patterns are largely unexplored, creating barriers to the development of effective therapeutic approaches to the treatment of ADPA. Objectives To investigate the transcriptome profile of ADPA using a sample of eight formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples of ADPA and healthy control tissue. Methods Transcriptome profiling was performed using the Affymetrix PrimeView Human Gene Expression Microarray and findings were validated via reverse transcription of RNA and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Results Transcriptome analyses showed increased tumour expression of 2266 genes, with significant involvement of cell cycle, ribosomal and crucial cancer pathways. Our results point to tumour overexpression of FGFR2 (P = 0Á001). Conclusions The results indicate the involvement of crucial oncogenic driver pathways, highlighting cell cycle and ribosomal pathways in the aetiology of ADPA. Suggested tumour overexpression of FGFR2 raises the hope that targeting the fibroblast growth factor (FGF)/FGF receptor axis might be a promising treatment for ADPA and probably for the overall group of sweat gland carcinomas. What's already known about this topic?• Aggressive digital papillary adenocarcinoma (ADPA) is a rare sporadic tumour, arising predominantly from sweat glands of fingers or toes.• ADPA is characterized by a local aggressive behaviour, a high recurrence rate and an emerging metastatic potential.• ADPA is most probably driven by somatic mutations. However, somatic mutation patterns are largely unexplored.• Knowledge of the biology of ADPA is almost completely lacking, creating barriers to the development of effective therapy strategies. Gene expression profiling in aggressive digital papillary adenocarcinoma, H.M. Surowy et al. 1153 a Paired t-test [cycle threshold (DCt) of tumour and control tissue]. b Not reliably detected in >1 ADPA tumours. Gene expression profiling in aggressive digital papillary adenocarcinoma, H.M. Surowy et al. 1155Fig 4.Differentially expressed genes (P < 0Á05, P detection < 0Á05, ratio < 0Á67 or > 1Á5) associated with the gene ontology (GO) 'angiogenesis' (GO:0001525) were subjected to cluster analysis and the resulting heatmaps and dendrograms show a clear separation of a tumour (T) and a normal tissue (N) cluster. Note: the official gene symbol for interleukin 8 is now CXCL8.

Digital Papillary Adenocarcinoma, a Rare Malignant Tumor

“…The etiology of DPA is largely unknown; a BRAF-V600E mutation has been reported in one case [6], but the significance of this finding is unclear, with new reports of genetic tumor overexpression of FGFR2 [7].…”

Aggressive Digital Papillary Adenocarcinoma Mimicking a Giant Cell Tumour – A Case Report and Review of the Literature

“…Other sequencing analysis showed BRAF V600E mutations in one out of nine tumours [14]. Future chemotherapeutic targets will likely require molecular characterization of recurrent and metastatic ADPAca samples [13].…”

“…This is often reserved for palliative treatment. Surowy et al have recently carried out transcriptome profiling on ADPAca and identified the overexpression of fibroblast growth factor FGFR2 [13]. Other sequencing analysis showed BRAF V600E mutations in one out of nine tumours [14].…”

Limited immunoexpression of fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) in digital papillary adenocarcinoma: Comparison of FGFR2 immunohistochemistry between digital papillary adenocarcinoma, other sweat gland tumors and normal skin tissue

“…Kosuke SATAKE, 1,2 Keisuke GOTO, 2,3,4,5,6 Takashi SUGINO, 2 Yosuke SASAKI, 1 Shusuke YOSHIKAWA, 1 Yoshio KIYOHARA 1 1…”