The Essence of Chromatography 2003
DOI: 10.1016/b978-044450198-1/50014-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

General Concepts in Column Chromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 250 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, we conclude that the sample introduction system is responsible for the observed tailing in the ion chromatograms and it is not caused by the analyte separation on the column. The tailing in the introduction system leads to a decrease in chromatographic resolution 34 (calculated from the peak width at half height) from e.g. 3.3 between the FA and AA peaks in the UV chromatogram to 0.8 in the MS signals.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, we conclude that the sample introduction system is responsible for the observed tailing in the ion chromatograms and it is not caused by the analyte separation on the column. The tailing in the introduction system leads to a decrease in chromatographic resolution 34 (calculated from the peak width at half height) from e.g. 3.3 between the FA and AA peaks in the UV chromatogram to 0.8 in the MS signals.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These parameters were included in the chromatographic response function (CRF) for evaluation of the performance of our method (Poole, 2003). These parameters were included in the chromatographic response function (CRF) for evaluation of the performance of our method (Poole, 2003).…”
Section: Methods Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the equation had the following distribution: Parameters in the model were final chromatographic time, resolution between each peak and the number of peaks. These parameters were included in the chromatographic response function (CRF) for evaluation of the performance of our method (Poole, 2003).…”
Section: Methods Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations