General practitioners’ views and experiences in caring for patients after sepsis: a qualitative interview study

Abstract

BackgroundPatients surviving critical illnesses, such as sepsis, often suffer from long-term complications. After discharge from hospital, most patients are treated in primary care. Little is known how general practitioners (GPs) perform critical illness aftercare and how it can be improved. Within a randomised controlled trial, an outreach training programme has been developed and applied.ObjectivesThe aim of this study is to describe GPs’ views and experiences of caring for postsepsis patients and of participating a specific outreach training.DesignSemistructured qualitative interviews.Setting14 primary care practices in the metropolitan area of Berlin, Germany.Participants14 GPs who had participated in a structured sepsis aftercare programme in primary care.ResultsThemes identified in sepsis aftercare were: continuity of care and good relationship with patients, GP’s experiences during their patient’s critical illness and impact of persisting symptoms. An outreach education as part of the intervention was considered by the GPs to be acceptable, helpful to improve knowledge of the management of postintensive care complications and useful for sepsis aftercare in daily practice.ConclusionsGPs provide continuity of care to patients surviving sepsis. Better communication at the intensive care unit–GP interface and training in management of long-term complications of sepsis may be helpful to improve sepsis aftercare.Trial registration numberISRCTN61744782.

Hospital Discharge Summaries Are Insufficient Following ICU Stays: A Qualitative Study

“…Overall, our study indicates that discharge summaries fail to support effective transitions in many instances. Although little research has explored direct discharge-related communication between ICU teams and PCPs, our evidence aligns with others that suggest that PCPs value this communication (6, 26–28) and for a possible role for ICU discharge summaries, or an ICU-specific section within hospital discharge summaries, for outpatient follow-up specifically (20, 29). Puthucheary et al (30) piloted the use of a tool, completed by the ICU discharging physician, about patients’ rehabilitation needs.…”

Facilitating high quality acute care in resource-constrained environments: Perspectives of patients recovering from sepsis, their caregivers and healthcare workers in Uganda and Malawi

“…Our study highlighted additional factors which impact on sepsis care, including long patient waiting times, limited explanations of patients' diagnosis and prognosis, disparities in provision of care and lack of nutritional meals. Those few studies which have documented hospital experiences of patients with sepsis, their caregivers and HCWs derive from HIC settings [9,10]. The studies about sepsis in LIC settings are mostly specific to one group of participants, a section of the hospital or a component of sepsis care.…”

White Paper – Verbesserung der Versorgungs- und Behandlungsangebote für Menschen mit Sepsis- und Infektionsfolgen

“…Die Vermeidung dieser Folgen muss bereits während der Akutbehandlung einsetzenund ihre weitere Behandlung muss sich unmittelbar daran anschließen. Nicht nur Betroffene [16], sondern auch Hausärzt*innen geben darüber hinaus einen Bedarf an weiteren Informationen zur Akutbehandlung der Sepsis und den in diesem Rahmen getroffenen Behandlungsentscheidungen und abgeleiteten Behandlungsempfehlungen an [19]. Die Effektivität strukturierter Überleitungen, beispielsweise durch strukturierte Entlass-Planung oder digitale Zugriffsmöglichkeiten auf Entlass-Briefe oder Medikamentenverordnungen, wurde für andere Erkrankungen nachgewiesen [20].…”