2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2103.16042
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generalizable Physics-constrained Modeling using Learning and Inference assisted by Feature Space Engineering

Abstract: This work presents a formalism to improve the predictive accuracy of physical models by learning generalizable augmentations from sparse data. Building on recent advances in data-driven turbulence modeling, the present approach, referred to as Learning and Inference assisted by Feature Engineering (LIFE), is based on the hypothesis that robustness and generalizability demand a meticulously-designed feature space that is informed by the underlying physics, and a carefully constructed features-to-augmentation ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, neural networks have also been utilized to learn the optimal map between filtered and unfiltered variables in the approximate deconvolution framework for SGS modeling [26,27]. Apart from SGS closure modeling, machine learning (ML) and in particular DL is being increasingly applied for different problems in fluid mechanics, like superresolution of turbulent flows [28,29], Reynolds-Average Navier-Stokes (RANS) closure modeling [30][31][32], and reduced-order modeling [33][34][35][36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, neural networks have also been utilized to learn the optimal map between filtered and unfiltered variables in the approximate deconvolution framework for SGS modeling [26,27]. Apart from SGS closure modeling, machine learning (ML) and in particular DL is being increasingly applied for different problems in fluid mechanics, like superresolution of turbulent flows [28,29], Reynolds-Average Navier-Stokes (RANS) closure modeling [30][31][32], and reduced-order modeling [33][34][35][36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…into both model reduction [48,90] and system identification [19,49,91,92]. Precisely in this way, the energy-preserving constraint in Eq.…”
Section: Constraints In Model Reduction and System Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of reduced-order PDE models in fluid mechanics include the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations and Large-eddy Simulation (LES) equations. Recent research has explored using deep learning models for the closure of these equations [52,53,49,39,40,62,22,58,54,41]. In parallel, other classes of machine learning methods have also been developed for PDEs such as the physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) [47,48].…”
Section: Applications In Science and Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4] recently numerically optimized a linear PDE with a neural network source term using adjoint methods. [54,41], [22], and [58] use adjoint methods to calibrate nonlinear PDE models with neural network terms. [4,54,41,22,58] do not include a mathematical analysis of the adjoint method for PDE models with neural network terms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%