1997
DOI: 10.1068/b240007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generating and evaluating alternative regional development plans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to generate the set of alternative scenarios to be appraised, it is mandatory to identify and clearly define short-term goals, long-term objectives, and finally reach to a consensus among participants (Shefer et al, 1997). Numerous guidelines facilitate this process; the principle is that alternatives should be created that best achieve the values specified for the particular decision situation.…”
Section: Creation Of Alternativesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to generate the set of alternative scenarios to be appraised, it is mandatory to identify and clearly define short-term goals, long-term objectives, and finally reach to a consensus among participants (Shefer et al, 1997). Numerous guidelines facilitate this process; the principle is that alternatives should be created that best achieve the values specified for the particular decision situation.…”
Section: Creation Of Alternativesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon was linked to the availability of land for the expansion of firms, the development of physical infrastructure and communications systems, and the relative proximity of these areas to a large pool of highly skilled labour residing on the outskirts of the metropolitan area. A new outline and development plan was prepared for the Northern region in the early 1990s (Shefer et al, 1997). The strategic development concept suggested by the plan is to stop the urban sprawl of the Haifa metropolitan area by concentrating the main development effort in the Central Galilee-i.e.…”
Section: The Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technique was pioneered in the Netherlands by Voogd, Rietveld and Nijkamp in the late 1970's and early 1980's (Nijkamp 1979;Rietveld 1980;Voogd 1983;. Multicriteria evaluation has been applied from it's simple form (Shefer, Amir, Frenkel & Law-Yone 1997) to complex mathematical forms involving fuzzy logic (Xiang, Gross, Fabos & MacDougall 1992), utility function based optimisation (Malczewski & Orgryczak 1996) and interactive decision support systems (Teghem, Delhaye & Kunsch 1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%