2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2007.08.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic admixture and diversity estimations in the Mexican Mestizo population from Mexico City using 15 STR polymorphic markers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
40
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
40
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the predominant European male contribution has been also described in earlier analyses using Y chromosome markers (Builes et al 2007). The European ancestry proportion estimated in this group is lower than those described in studies of Latin American populations as Mexicans, Afro-Brazilians, Venezuelan, Costa Rican, and Colombians (Bedoya et al 2006;Bonilla et al 2004a, b;Carvajal-Carmona et al 2000;Martinez-Marignac et al 2007;Martinez et al 2007b;Morera et al 2003;Muniz et al 2008;Salari et al 2005;Shriver et al 2003), but higher than those in Mexican mestizos from Mexico city and African Americans (Juarez-Cedillo et al 2008;Parra et al 1998;Shriver et al 2003). On the contrary, the African ancestry in this population located in the Caribbean Coast of Colombia is lower than those described in other African Caribbean (Benn-Torres et al 2008;Miljkovic-Gacic et al 2005), and African American populations ) but higher than those described in urban Afro-Brazilian, Venezuelan and Costa Rican populations (Martinez et al 2007b;Morera et al 2003;Muniz et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Additionally, the predominant European male contribution has been also described in earlier analyses using Y chromosome markers (Builes et al 2007). The European ancestry proportion estimated in this group is lower than those described in studies of Latin American populations as Mexicans, Afro-Brazilians, Venezuelan, Costa Rican, and Colombians (Bedoya et al 2006;Bonilla et al 2004a, b;Carvajal-Carmona et al 2000;Martinez-Marignac et al 2007;Martinez et al 2007b;Morera et al 2003;Muniz et al 2008;Salari et al 2005;Shriver et al 2003), but higher than those in Mexican mestizos from Mexico city and African Americans (Juarez-Cedillo et al 2008;Parra et al 1998;Shriver et al 2003). On the contrary, the African ancestry in this population located in the Caribbean Coast of Colombia is lower than those described in other African Caribbean (Benn-Torres et al 2008;Miljkovic-Gacic et al 2005), and African American populations ) but higher than those described in urban Afro-Brazilian, Venezuelan and Costa Rican populations (Martinez et al 2007b;Morera et al 2003;Muniz et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…To determine whether an individual has alopecia, the normal density of the follicular units must be considered with regard to our Mexican mestizo characteristics, based on our unique genetic mixture – estimated as comprising 69% native Amerindian genes, 26% Caucasian, and 5% African [11-13]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,11,21,23,[25][26][27][28][29][30] The admixture estimates reported in these studies are based on blood groups, serum proteins, STRs and AIMs. As a whole, the data are consistent with the Mexican population history and reflect a gradient with a higher proportion of Native American ancestry in the southern states and increased ancestry of the African contribution in the states of the Gulf of Mexico.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%