2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0142-0615(01)00048-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic algorithm based unit commitment with energy contracts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several GAs have been proposed for the unit commitment problem, see e.g. [14,5,26,2,29,7,1], the main differences being the representation scheme, the decoding procedure, and the solution evaluation procedure (i.e. fitness function).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several GAs have been proposed for the unit commitment problem, see e.g. [14,5,26,2,29,7,1], the main differences being the representation scheme, the decoding procedure, and the solution evaluation procedure (i.e. fitness function).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea of this technique is to convert any infeasible individuals to a feasible solution by repairing the sequential possible violations constraints in the NSUCP problem. The following four repairing mechanisms taking from literature [16,55,[57][58][59] are incorporated in the proposed algorithm.…”
Section: • Repairing Technique • Penalizing Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The repairing technique means to take an infeasible chromosome and generate a feasible one through some repairing procedure [55]. For many combinatorial optimization problems, it is relatively easy to create a repairing procedure [56], there for a repairing technique is used in this paper to handle with infeasible solution.…”
Section: Handling Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%