2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic diversity targets and indicators in the CBD post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework must be improved

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
361
2
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 379 publications
(437 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
7
361
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results also have usefulness in the context of the Convention on Biological Diversity Target 13 on "genetic erosion". The Red List Index is currently an indicator for this Target but we suggest that a rule of thumb such as 0.4N c below thresholds such as 50 and 500 could be complementary with more genetic relevance and a better predictor of extinction risk (Laikre et al 2020, Hoban et al 2020. We acknowledge that this approach is imperfect, but including genetic factors (which have known influences on population persistence) is an improvement over no indicators at all.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results also have usefulness in the context of the Convention on Biological Diversity Target 13 on "genetic erosion". The Red List Index is currently an indicator for this Target but we suggest that a rule of thumb such as 0.4N c below thresholds such as 50 and 500 could be complementary with more genetic relevance and a better predictor of extinction risk (Laikre et al 2020, Hoban et al 2020. We acknowledge that this approach is imperfect, but including genetic factors (which have known influences on population persistence) is an improvement over no indicators at all.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, this relationship can be hard to assess as it can be affected by either habitat factors or population changes over time (Belmar‐Lucero et al., 2012; Fraser et al., 2007). Although the high ratios observed are likely to be a result of the sensitivity of the Ne estimation methods to small sample sizes, our work suggests that Ne/Nc ratios ranging from 0.24 to 0.78 are plausible for slow breeding mammals (Hoban et al., 2020), but there is little evidence to permit comparison of these results with other bat species. When using the LD method, we found that Ne/Nc ratios showed a log‐linear relationship with N, which agrees with Palstra and Fraser (2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Consequently, there has been an increase in the use of effective population size (Ne) estimates, to provide an insight into both demographic and genetic changes in populations (Luikart et al., 2010; Palstra & Fraser, 2012). These molecular approaches along with other indicators of genetic diversity are increasingly being considered to meet global conservation goals (Hoban et al., 2020; IUCN ‐ World Conservation Congress, 2020) and have the potential to supplement or replace traditional long‐term monitoring methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these taxa meet IUCN criteria for some degree of extinction risk, such as S. brassicoides and S. costae, inserted in the Red Book of Flora of Brazil (Martinelli and Moraes 2013). Hoban et al (2020) state the importance of including in global conservation policy (e.g., CDB-Convention on Biological Diversity) targets and indicators for genetic diversity for all species, and not just for domesticated species. The present study's results of the microsatellite marker transfer can contribute significantly to research about the levels and patterns of genetic diversity of Stigmatodon species, contributing for understanding the adaptive, evolutionary and survival rates of these taxa, and to the establishment of effective conservation strategies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%