Genetic testing users in Italy and Germany: Health orientation, health‐related habits, and psychological profile

Abstract

Background Rapid advances in genomic knowledge and widespread access to the web contributed to the development of genetic services by private companies or medical laboratories. In the European landscape, though, there is not a single coherent regulatory approach to genetic testing (GT). The study aimed to investigate differences and similarities between two populations of GT users, Italians and Germans, in terms of health‐related behaviors, psychological characteristics, and attitudes toward genetic information. Methods Ninety‐nine Italian GT users from one private genetic company and 64 Germans GT users from one medical laboratory, completed an ad hoc self‐administered questionnaire. Results Results showed significant differences in health‐related behaviors (unhealthy eating behaviors, smoking behaviors, and frequency in medical check‐ups), with Germans reporting higher levels of unhealthy eating habits and smoking behaviors than Italians; Italian users also were more medically controlled. Furthermore, German participants were less willing to change their lifestyle following the GT results compared to Italian participants. Regarding psychological variables, German users felt more confident about their physical well‐being and they seemed more motivated than Italians to avoid becoming unhealthy. Finally, two samples differed in the way they accessed genetic testing (with the Italians guided predominately by a physician in contrast with the Germans who were recommended by friends) and managed genetic testing results (with Italian participants significantly more willing to share results with doctors than German participants, who preferred sharing with the family). Conclusion The analysis of cultural and organizational differences could help in defining adequate guidelines for counseling, and provide inputs for regulators in different European contexts.

Psychological Determinants of Men’s Adherence to Cascade Screening for BRCA1/2

“…Therefore, young age acted as a facilitating factor for the intention to undergo genetic testing. The result of this study is consistent with the literature, which identifies younger people with higher interest and more positive attitudes in genetic testing [29,[47][48][49]. This result may also depend on the greater awareness of younger participants who have been exposed to professional communication about risk for years and, maybe, have higher knowledge.…”

The role of caregivers in the clinical pathway of patients newly diagnosed with breast and prostate cancer: A study protocol

“…People who take an active role in their health have a greater feeling of control and are more likely to adopt positive health behaviors (Arnaboldi et al, 2017 ; Oliveri et al, 2020a , 2022 ; Ongaro et al, 2022 ). For this reason, patient empowerment is more important than ever to manage a serious condition like cancer: patients are often called to make decisions together with their oncologists about the treatment to undergo, favoring the shared decision making (Howell et al, 2021 ).…”

Decision-making process about prenatal genetic screening: how deeply do moms-to-be want to know from Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing?

“…Concerning the first result, in other studies conducted on the Italian population the dominant role of the specialized physician emerged [55][56][57], also referred to the choice of undergoing genetic testing for personal disease risk calculation, and it was prevalent compared to other cultural contexts [58,59].…”