2017
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2017.1540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome diversity in the Neolithic Globular Amphorae culture and the spread of Indo-European languages

Abstract: It is unclear whether Indo-European languages in Europe spread from the Pontic steppes in the late Neolithic, or from Anatolia in the Early Neolithic. Under the former hypothesis, people of the Globular Amphorae culture (GAC) would be descended from Eastern ancestors, likely representing the Yamnaya culture. However, nuclear (six individuals typed for 597 573 SNPs) and mitochondrial (11 complete sequences) DNA from the GAC appear closer to those of earlier Neolithic groups than to the DNA of all other populati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

6
26
1
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
6
26
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…central Europe) have however shown a varying degree of Steppe ancestry 1,10 . This component has not been demonstrated among individuals associated with the Globular Amphora culture 11,13,14 . Although our knowledge about the demographic prehistory in continental Europe has increased immensely over the last five years [1][2][3][4][5][6] the regional resolution of the events is insufficient and, thus, our understanding of the social processes is still lacking.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…central Europe) have however shown a varying degree of Steppe ancestry 1,10 . This component has not been demonstrated among individuals associated with the Globular Amphora culture 11,13,14 . Although our knowledge about the demographic prehistory in continental Europe has increased immensely over the last five years [1][2][3][4][5][6] the regional resolution of the events is insufficient and, thus, our understanding of the social processes is still lacking.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Individuals of the GAC and CWC have very different ancestry. Individuals from CWC contexts in Poland exhibit a marked input from the eastern Yamnaya Steppe pastoralist whereas the individuals of the GAC complex hardly exhibit any Steppe ancestry 11,13,19 . Around 2400 BCE the Bell Beaker culture (BBC) complex enters this region, from the southwest, and yet another major genetic component is added to the local population 5,21 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The knowledge about the genetic history of prehistoric Europeans has increased substantially during the past three years following a series of studies that have provided new insights about the ancestry and affinities of Neolithic, Chalcolithic and Bronze Age populations from various parts of Europe 1 19 . Recent ancient DNA (aDNA) genome-wide studies have particularly addressed the extent of genetic admixture between Neolithic farmers and hunter-gatherers (HG) and found evidence of regional variability in the level and nature of the admixture in Iberia 5 , 9 , 19 , 20 , south-east 6 , 10 , 13 , 16 , central 1 , 2 , 7 , 15 , north-eastern 4 , 6 , 14 , and northwestern Europe 5 , 8 . In regions such as the Baltic, however, genomic data has shown that hunter-gatherer populations adopted farming without a significant genetic input from farming populations 14 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nine skeletons were collected from typical Khazar burial kurgans in the southern Russian steppes (see Supplement for details). Genotypes of ancient Eurasians (1st millennium BC-10th millennium BC) were obtained from https://reich.hms.harvard.edu/datasets; these datasets correspond to the following recent publications: [26,[39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50]. The datasets were stratified into 6 cohorts by the estimated age of the samples: 0-1000 BC, 1000-2000 BC, 2000-3000 BC, 3000-4000 BC, 4000-5000 BC, and above 5000 BC.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%