Geo-referencing remote images for precision agriculture using artificial terrestrial targets

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to assess co-registration errors in remote imagery through the AUGEO system, which consists of geo-referenced coloured tarps acting as terrestrial targets (TT), captured in the imagery and semi-automatically recognised by AUGEO2.0 Ò software. This works as an add-on of ENVI Ò for image co-registration. To validate AUGEO, TT were placed in the ground, and remote images from satellite Quick Bird (QB), airplanes and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) were taken at several locations in Andalusia (southern Spain) in 2008 and 2009. Any geo-referencing system tested showed some error in comparison with the Differential Global Positioning System (DGPS)-geo-referenced verification targets. Generally, the AUGEO system provided higher geo-referencing accuracy than the other systems tried. The root mean square errors (RMSE) from the panchromatic and multi-spectral QB images were around 8 and 9 m, respectively and, once co-registered by AUGEO, they were about 1.5 and 2.5 m, for the same images. Overlapping the QB-AUGEO-geo-referenced image and the National Geographic Information System (NGIS) produced a RMSE of 6.5 m, which is hardly acceptable for precision agriculture. The AUGEO system efficiently geo-referenced farm airborne images with a mean accuracy of about 0.5-1.5 m, and the UAV images showed a mean accuracy of 1.0-4.0 m. The geo-referencing accuracy of an image refers to its consistency despite changes in its spatial resolution. A higher number of TT used in the geo-referencing process leads to a lower obtained RMSE. For example, for an image of 80 ha, about 10 and 17 TT were needed to get a RMSE less than about 2 and 1 m. Similarly, with the same number of TT, accuracy was higher for smaller plots as compared to larger plots. Precision agriculture requires high spatial resolution images (i.e., \1.5 m pixel -1 ), accurately geo-referenced (errors \1-2 m). With the current DGPS technology, satellite and airplane images hardly meet this geo-referencing requirement; consequently, additional co-registration effort is needed. This can be achieved using georeferenced TT and AUGEO, mainly in areas where no notable hard points are available.

The role of technoparks in technological upgrading of the economy. The example of agricultural production

“…The possibilities of using unmanned aerial vehicles to solve this problem have been analyzed in the works of D. Gómez-Candón, L. García-Torres F. López-Granados, J.J. Caballero-Novella, M. Gómez-Casero, A.I. De Castro, M. Jurado-Expósito [7,8]. In the work of S. Cubero, W.S.…”

Census Parcels Cropping System Classification from Multitemporal Remote Imagery: A Proposed Universal Methodology

“…First, images with a high spatial resolution (i.e., 2 to 5 m of pixel) should be normally used to avoid or minimize crop-mixing pixels [ 4 ]. Second, georeferencing errors between the series of high spatial resolution images of the same scene are common and need to be corrected using hard-control points or the co-registration of each other to provide a given parcel with the same geographical references at any image [ 25 ]. Third, each image is instantaneity a given invariant features of an image series that does not normally provide the same reflectance or digital reading as that in the others images [ 31 ]; therefore, for classification purposes, multitemporal series of images should be calibrated or normalized.…”

“…The ground was predominantly flat, with average slopes of a 2.12% grade. The georeferencing accuracy of the GeoEye-1 images was improved using ground control points (GCPs) and image-to-image co-registration as previously described [ 25 ]. The series of images were radiometrically normalized through pseudo-invariant features using the ARIN procedure [ 26 ].…”

Research Article: Extraction of Small Spatial Plots from Geo-Registered UAS Imagery of Crop Fields

“…A Python script was written to automatically locate the midpoints of the targets in the imagery based on color thresholds and centroid calculations (Harwin and Lucieer, 2012;Gomez-Candon et al, 2011). These image coordinates, along with their corresponding map coordinates, were written to a text file that could be directly incorporated in the image processing workflow.…”