2013
DOI: 10.3133/ds801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geochemical and mineralogical data for soils of the conterminous United States

Abstract: For more information on the USGS-the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1-888-ASK-USGS.For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprodTo order this and other USGS information products, visit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

11
192
1
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(206 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
11
192
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Using a generalized random tessellation stratified design for sample site selection, 4,857 sample sites (~1 site per 1,600 km 2 ) were utilized for the USGS North American Soil Geochemical Landscapes Project, and 209 of those sites were utilized in this study [14]. In a major geochemical mapping project such as this, the quality of chemical analyses is of utmost importance.…”
Section: Sample Sites and Geochemical Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Using a generalized random tessellation stratified design for sample site selection, 4,857 sample sites (~1 site per 1,600 km 2 ) were utilized for the USGS North American Soil Geochemical Landscapes Project, and 209 of those sites were utilized in this study [14]. In a major geochemical mapping project such as this, the quality of chemical analyses is of utmost importance.…”
Section: Sample Sites and Geochemical Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quality control samples (RMs and analytical duplicates) constituted approximately 12% of the total number of samples analyzed. A complete discussion of the QC protocols used in this project, including detailed tables of bias and precision, is given in Smith et al (2013) [14].…”
Section: Sample Sites and Geochemical Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations