2010
DOI: 10.1080/01650521.2010.494025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geographic call variation and further notes on habitat of Ameerega flavopicta (Anura, Dendrobatidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies found evidence of clinal variation in calls, either resulting from altitudinal differences between populations (Narins & Smith 1986;Lüddecke & Sánchez 2002;O'Neill & Beard 2011;Narins & Meenderink 2014;Baraquet et al 2015), or from latitudinal and/or longitudinal differences (Smith et al 2003a;Bernal et al 2005;Pröhl et al 2007;Magrini et al 2010;Faria et al 2013;Baraquet et al 2015;Forti et al 2016). Additionally, geographic barrier effects on populational differences in frog calls have been recorded (Simões et al 2008;Magrini et al 2010;.…”
Section: Geography and Geneticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some studies found evidence of clinal variation in calls, either resulting from altitudinal differences between populations (Narins & Smith 1986;Lüddecke & Sánchez 2002;O'Neill & Beard 2011;Narins & Meenderink 2014;Baraquet et al 2015), or from latitudinal and/or longitudinal differences (Smith et al 2003a;Bernal et al 2005;Pröhl et al 2007;Magrini et al 2010;Faria et al 2013;Baraquet et al 2015;Forti et al 2016). Additionally, geographic barrier effects on populational differences in frog calls have been recorded (Simões et al 2008;Magrini et al 2010;.…”
Section: Geography and Geneticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies found evidence of clinal variation in calls, either resulting from altitudinal differences between populations (Narins & Smith 1986;Lüddecke & Sánchez 2002;O'Neill & Beard 2011;Narins & Meenderink 2014;Baraquet et al 2015), or from latitudinal and/or longitudinal differences (Smith et al 2003a;Bernal et al 2005;Pröhl et al 2007;Magrini et al 2010;Faria et al 2013;Baraquet et al 2015;Forti et al 2016). Additionally, geographic barrier effects on populational differences in frog calls have been recorded (Simões et al 2008;Magrini et al 2010;. Pleiotropic effects of body size may also contribute to call trait differences between different populations: populations might differ in body size and, as a consequence, in acoustic traits (Nevo & Capranica 1985;Narins & Smith 1986;Castellano et al 2000;Smith et al 2003b;Márquez-García et al 2009;O'Neill & Beard 2011;Micancin & Wiley 2014;Narins & Meenderink 2014;Baraquet et al 2015).…”
Section: Geography and Geneticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, some species as Ameerega flavopicta, endemic to the Cerrado biome, were observed only in areas of Cerrado stricto sensu. A. flavopicta occupy open physiognomies of the Cerrado ecosystem, with males calling mainly from rock crevices (Toledo et al 2004;Costa et al 2006;Magrini et al 2010;Martins and Giaretta 2012). The species is considered to be of ''Least Concern'' by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN, 2013).…”
Section: Amphibiansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Call duration and interval between calls were larger than those from other states (Toledo et al, 2004;Costa et al, 2006) and even from other populations in Minas Gerais (Haddad and Martins, 1994). However, Magrini et al (2010) reported variation in call parameters of A. flavopicta (call duration, intercall interval, call rate, and frequency) among localities, a population from Perdizes municipality (Minas Gerais) being similar to the population we studied at Pirapitinga in all these parameters. We observed a fundamental frequency (1.9 6 0.05 Khz) in the calls of the studied population of A. flavopicta that is not reported in any other study of the species' call (see Haddad and Martins, 1994;Toledo et al, 2004;Costa et al, 2006;Magrini et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…However, Magrini et al (2010) reported variation in call parameters of A. flavopicta (call duration, intercall interval, call rate, and frequency) among localities, a population from Perdizes municipality (Minas Gerais) being similar to the population we studied at Pirapitinga in all these parameters. We observed a fundamental frequency (1.9 6 0.05 Khz) in the calls of the studied population of A. flavopicta that is not reported in any other study of the species' call (see Haddad and Martins, 1994;Toledo et al, 2004;Costa et al, 2006;Magrini et al, 2010). Dominant frequency at the Pirapitinga population was similar to the value reported for populations at localities in central and southeastern Brazil (Toledo et al, 2004) and higher than those reported for Parque Estadual da Serra de Caldas Novas (Costa et al, 2006) and Santana do Riacho (Haddad and Martins, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%