1985
DOI: 10.1029/ja090ia02p01283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GEOS 2 electric field observations during a sudden commencement and subsequent substorms

Abstract: This paper presents and discusses electric field and plasma density data obtained by the GEOS 2 double probe experiment on March 22, 1979. The observation period encompasses a sudden storm commencement and two consecutive substorms. The E field data are compared with magnetic field recordings both at GEOS and on the ground. The influence of the solar wind on magnetospheric dynamics is studied with the help of additional data from IMP 8 and ISEE 3. The E field data, which were obtained when GEOS was in the days… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
16
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At station 3, sinusoidal oscillations are recorded with a period of 240 s, the maximum amplitude is clearly seen further south of this, e.g. at v 5X9X The period and form of the oscillations is in good agreement with electric ®eld oscillations i Dcomponent) observed by GEOS-2 (Knott et al, 1985).…”
Section: Geomagnetic Pulsationssupporting
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At station 3, sinusoidal oscillations are recorded with a period of 240 s, the maximum amplitude is clearly seen further south of this, e.g. at v 5X9X The period and form of the oscillations is in good agreement with electric ®eld oscillations i Dcomponent) observed by GEOS-2 (Knott et al, 1985).…”
Section: Geomagnetic Pulsationssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…To identify with con®dence these oscillations requires: (1) simultaneous observations by a series of satellites in the outer magnetosphere and at an extended meridional chain of stations, and (2) studying time intervals not coincident with the active phase of a substorm which produces a number of disturbances, distorts the eigen-oscillations and makes their identi®cation dicult. These requirements were not fully met in Knott et al (1985) and Warnecke et al (1990) which probably did not permit the global oscillations to be observed unambiguously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The feature of the magnetic and electric field perturbations and high energy particle modulations during SCs in the inner magnetosphere has been well known (e.g., Knott et al, 1985;Laakso and Schmidt, 1989;Cahill et al, 1990;Blake et al, 1992;Li et al, 1993;Wygant et al, 1994;Wilson et al, 2001;Shinbori et al, 2004aShinbori et al, , 2004b. A case study of an SC event which occurred on March 24, 1991 observed by the CRRES satellite was reported by Wygant et al (1994), who showed that the electric and magnetic field perturbation with the bipolar waveform in the inner magnetosphere (L = 2.6) at the nightside (02:40 MLT) have large amplitude of about 80 mV/m and 140 nT, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, this picture of the magnetospheric PI generation and its transmission to low latitudes is the extrapolation of the Nishida-Tamao mechanism to the inner magnetosphere. The comparison of ssc electric transient in the magnetosphere with conjugated ground magnetic variations demonstrated ir/2 rotation of the signal in the ionosphere, typical for Alfven mode (Nishida, 1964;Knott et al, 1985). So, the observation at the geostationary satellite and on the ground indicate the possibility of the excitation of an Alfven pulse at the front of a compressional wave.…”
Section: Possible Mechanisms Of MI and Pimentioning
confidence: 99%