2017
DOI: 10.1111/jbi.13152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geostatistical interpolation can reliably extend coverage of a very high‐resolution model of temperature‐dependent sex determination

Abstract: Aim Recognition that statistical models do not always reliably predict habitat suitability under future climate scenarios is leading increasingly to explicit incorporation of the physiological constraints that underlie species’ distributions into spatially explicit predictions. However, computational intensity constrains the use of high‐resolution, process‐explicit models. We examined whether geostatistical analysis can effectively interpolate a biophysical model, reducing the computational investment typicall… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At each location, hourly values were summarized as daily averages for these 90-day periods were again summarized to a mean wettest and driest quarter average for each point location over a 10-year period. In order to rescale these data back to the native 1–arc-second resolution, we used an interpolation approach ( Carter et al., 2018 ), where the microclimatic data at our 20–arc-second resolution were fed into a generalized linear model (GLM) informed by the edaphic and geomorphological data for each location. We generated unique GLMs for each microclimatic parameter for the wettest and driest quarters using the ‘stats’ package.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At each location, hourly values were summarized as daily averages for these 90-day periods were again summarized to a mean wettest and driest quarter average for each point location over a 10-year period. In order to rescale these data back to the native 1–arc-second resolution, we used an interpolation approach ( Carter et al., 2018 ), where the microclimatic data at our 20–arc-second resolution were fed into a generalized linear model (GLM) informed by the edaphic and geomorphological data for each location. We generated unique GLMs for each microclimatic parameter for the wettest and driest quarters using the ‘stats’ package.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparisons of remnant populations with translocated populations are useful to understand changes in demography (e.g., sex ratios, mating systems, and populations trends), phenotypic plasticity and phenology (e.g., Mitchell et al, 2008;Miller et al, 2012;Rout et al, 2013). Further development of mechanistic models for tuatara should be undertaken to explore responses of populations to climate change in existing and novel environments (e.g., Carter et al, 2018). The resulting mechanistic models could also be compared to results from correlative SDMs, potentially providing key insights into processes shaping the species' range limits (Tingley et al, 2014;Briscoe et al, 2016).…”
Section: Tuatara Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A poorly explored but promising strategy to develop macroecological models of geographical variation of species richness and thus overcome knowledge gaps includes techniques of geostatistical interpolation. Interpolation models originated in the geological sciences for mining purposes (Cressie, ) and have been incorporated increasingly in other disciplines (Zhou et al, ), including ecology and biogeography (Carter, Kearney, Hartley, Porter, & Nelson, ; Kreft & Jetz, ). Spatial interpolation takes advantage of the spatial autocorrelation in geographical data, which is the similarity among observations as a function of their distance (Cliff & Ord, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%