2016
DOI: 10.2113/jeeg21.1.13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geotechnical Parameters from Seismic Measurements: Two Field Examples from Egypt and Saudi Arabia

Abstract: Geotechnical parameters were used to determine subsurface rock quality for construction purposes. We summarize the mathematical relationships used to calculate the geotechnical parameters from P-and S-wave velocities and density values. These relationships are applied to two field examples; the first is a regional seismic study in Egypt and the second is a 2-D seismic profile recorded in Saudi Arabia. Results from both field examples are used to determine the subsurface rock quality and locate zones that shoul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Again from Table 3.1, Euro Code EC08, in the parameters column, it is mentioned that to define the ground type, along with Vs, the standard penetration test (SPT) N-value will help to reinforce the claim of soil type. So the N-value is determined based on Equation (3), proposed by [4]. It is seen that apart from site Dhamdhara I, the rest of the N-values are either >50 or nearer to 50 (Table 2) which almost satisfies the above claim of ground type B listed in Euro Code EC08.…”
Section: Geophysical Site Explorationmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Again from Table 3.1, Euro Code EC08, in the parameters column, it is mentioned that to define the ground type, along with Vs, the standard penetration test (SPT) N-value will help to reinforce the claim of soil type. So the N-value is determined based on Equation (3), proposed by [4]. It is seen that apart from site Dhamdhara I, the rest of the N-values are either >50 or nearer to 50 (Table 2) which almost satisfies the above claim of ground type B listed in Euro Code EC08.…”
Section: Geophysical Site Explorationmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…One of the most popular methods to understand the possible hazards of seismic events on infrastructure development is by using geophysical methods. These methods have been used for several years by researchers and practitioners related to soils and foundations applications [4,5] and highway site investigation [6][7][8][9]. Geophysical methods not only provide means for probing the soil properties, sediments and rock outcrops but also to calculate the dynamic properties of soils like soil compression and shear wave velocities [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional methods, viz. cone penetration test (CPT), provide required parameters of the soil but are costly and invasive, particularly in hilly terrains [16]. Seismic refraction tomography technique (SRT) as well as the multichannel analysis of surface waves (MASW), on the other hand, is time efficient and cost effective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past years, seismic refraction methods have been used for civil engineering purposes in mountainous terrain [10,14,28]. They have been used to locate faults and in determining the soil parameters [4,16]. The SRT is a geophysical method which uses inversion technique to obtain 2D velocity depth profile [17,22,23] that images the cross-sectional picture along the profile by using the soils' response to the energy from the external source [6,7,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding the subsurface rock quality and structure is a recent and strong development in geophysics [1]. Before now, obtaining geotechnical parameters of subsurface soil or rock requires direct measurements from a cone penetrometer (CPT), which measures soil resistance to penetration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%