2023
DOI: 10.1111/jon.13127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ghost infarct core: A systematic review of the frequency, magnitude, and variables of CT perfusion overestimation

Abstract: Background and PurposeCT perfusion (CTP) imaging is now widely used to select patients with large vessel occlusions for mechanical thrombectomy. Ghost infarct core (GIC) phenomenon has been coined to describe CTP core overestimation and has been investigated in several retrospective studies. Our aim is to review the frequency, magnitude, and variables associated with this phenomenon.MethodsA primary literature search resulted in eight studies documenting median time from symptom onset to CTP, median estimated … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7 Gradually, relative CBF (rCBF) has emerged as the preferred metric for determining the ischemic core. 8 A threshold for the time to peak of the residue function (Tmax) exceeding 6 seconds has been identified as a reliable predictor for tissues at risk of infarction if there is no reperfusion. 9 However, the extent to which different software solutions can be used interchangeably, especially in terms of their clinical significance for planning treatment and estimating prognosis, remains uncertain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Gradually, relative CBF (rCBF) has emerged as the preferred metric for determining the ischemic core. 8 A threshold for the time to peak of the residue function (Tmax) exceeding 6 seconds has been identified as a reliable predictor for tissues at risk of infarction if there is no reperfusion. 9 However, the extent to which different software solutions can be used interchangeably, especially in terms of their clinical significance for planning treatment and estimating prognosis, remains uncertain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, there has been considerable inconsistency in the parameters of CTP and the quantitative benchmarks set for delineating the ischemic core and penumbra ( Yedavalli et al, 2023 ). Gradually, relative CBF (rCBF) has emerged as the preferred metric for determining the ischemic core ( Ballout et al, 2023 ). A threshold for the time to peak of the residue function ( T max ) exceeding 6 s has been identified as a reliable predictor for tissues at risk of infarction if there is no reperfusion ( Fainardi et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%