2001
DOI: 10.1023/a:1015134427592
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glass Domes with Adjustable Windows: A Novel Technique for Exposing Juvenile Forest Stands to Elevated CO<sub>2</sub> Concentration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No statistically significant differences in microclimatic parameters were found between the domes supplied with ambient and elevated [CO 2 ]. The detailed description of the facility is given in Urban et al (2001). Plants were grown in their native soil.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No statistically significant differences in microclimatic parameters were found between the domes supplied with ambient and elevated [CO 2 ]. The detailed description of the facility is given in Urban et al (2001). Plants were grown in their native soil.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since spring 2006 spruce trees were grown under two treatments inside the domes which diff er in atmospheric [CO 2 ]: ambient (A, 385 μmol(CO 2 ) mol −1 ) and elevated (E, A+385 μmol(CO 2 ) mol −1 ). The equipment and environmental conditions -which were comparable in the both treatments and were the same as outside except the CO 2 -are described in Urban et al (2001) in detail. In this locality, natural soil content of mineral nitrogen and available nitrogen forms are low throughout the whole soil profi le (Formánek, 2000).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Norway spruce needles were collected from the experimental site of CzechGlobe AS CR in Moravskoslezské Beskydy (Beskid Mountains, Czech Republic), where the glass domes had controlled levels of CO 2 concentration; with ambient atmospheric CO 2 concentration (AC) and elevated CO 2 concentration (EC = 700 ppm) (Urban et al, 2001). The comparison was done separately in four combinations of CO 2 concentration and irradiance: sun needles in ambient CO 2 (AC sun), shade needles in ambient CO 2 (AC shade), sun needles in elevated CO 2 (EC sun) and shade needles in elevated CO 2 (EC shade).…”
Section: Experimental Site and Sample Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%