2022
DOI: 10.5194/essd-14-5333-2022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global land surface 250 m 8 d fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (FAPAR) product from 2000 to 2021

Abstract: Abstract. The fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (FAPAR) is a critical land surface variable for carbon cycle modeling and ecological monitoring. Several global FAPAR products have been released and have become widely used; however, spatiotemporal inconsistency remains a large issue for the current products, and their spatial resolutions and accuracies can hardly meet the user requirements. An effective solution to improve the spatiotemporal continuity and accuracy of FAPAR products is to… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that there is still a significant part of the variation (about 10%) that we could not map on this scale of work. Our validation of the aggregated monthly FAPAR against ground reference measurements shows agreement with the validation of GLASS FAPAR V6 by Ma et al (2022) against ground measurements, who reported an R 2 of 0.8, but for their 8-day product. The validation of our FAPAR model predictions show high agreement with ground reference measurements as well (R 2 = 0.75).…”
Section: Accuracy Of the Biophysical Models Explaining Faparsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This means that there is still a significant part of the variation (about 10%) that we could not map on this scale of work. Our validation of the aggregated monthly FAPAR against ground reference measurements shows agreement with the validation of GLASS FAPAR V6 by Ma et al (2022) against ground measurements, who reported an R 2 of 0.8, but for their 8-day product. The validation of our FAPAR model predictions show high agreement with ground reference measurements as well (R 2 = 0.75).…”
Section: Accuracy Of the Biophysical Models Explaining Faparsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The GLASS FAPAR V6 data is a harmonized and consistent time series of FAPAR at 250 m resolution, which covers the time period from 26th February 2000 to 27th December 2021 in 8 day interval steps (Ma et al, 2022). It is an improved version of the GLASS FAPAR V5 in terms of time series trend stability.…”
Section: Glass Fapar V6mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These data sets have been broadly used to investigate the influence of global environmental change on terrestrial ecosystem processes (Keenan et al., 2013, 2019; Q. Z. Liu et al., 2021; Z. Y. Zhang, Xiong, et al., 2023), and GPP and FAPAR from AmeriFlux are often used as reference benchmarks to validate remote sensing measurements (Ma et al., 2022; Ryu et al., 2018; Zheng et al., 2020). These three crop sites, US‐Ne1, US‐Ne2, and US‐Ne3, are equipped with an eddy covariance system, which includes a 3D sonic anemometer and an open‐ path or closed‐path CO 2 and H 2 O gas analyzer that is collocated with the sonic anemometer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%