2020
DOI: 10.3390/s20092543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global Muscle Coactivation of the Sound Limb in Gait of People with Transfemoral and Transtibial Amputation

Abstract: The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of the level of amputation and various prosthetic devices on the muscle activation of the sound limb in people with unilateral transfemoral and transtibial amputation. We calculated the global coactivation of 12 muscles using the time-varying multimuscle coactivation function method in 37 subjects with unilateral transfemoral amputation (10, 16, and 11 with mechanical, electronic, and bionic prostheses, respectively), 11 subjects with transtibial amputation, and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
18
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis on a population of TTA, TFA, and controls highlighted that people with amputation had a coactivation profile similar to the control population. However, the prosthetic gait led to an increased level of simultaneous activation during the loading response and push-off phases, whereas this coactivation was decreased during midstance and swing ( 46 ). This increased coactivation probably plays a role in the prosthetic gait asymmetry and altered energy consumption (III-C IND ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis on a population of TTA, TFA, and controls highlighted that people with amputation had a coactivation profile similar to the control population. However, the prosthetic gait led to an increased level of simultaneous activation during the loading response and push-off phases, whereas this coactivation was decreased during midstance and swing ( 46 ). This increased coactivation probably plays a role in the prosthetic gait asymmetry and altered energy consumption (III-C IND ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aside from that, BF loses its connection to the fibula and tibia, RF loses its connection to the base of the patella, and AM loses the hamstring portion of its insertion to the femur's adductor tubercle. The example above showed the modification of muscles' role to adapt to the prosthetic device [ 30 ]. As a result, prosthesis wearers with unaffected lower limbs will develop a balanced strategy to compensate for the absence of the ankle joint and muscles resulting from amputation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proximal muscles registered a decrease in CC between T1 and o-RAGT 1 (PAT02, PAT06, PAT18, PAT20) and between T1 and T2 (PAT02, PAT11, PAT14, PAT18), while the distal muscles did not. In the future, an advanced analysis of sEMG (by means of a time-varying multi-muscle coactivation function) could help to investigate the o-RAGT effects, in terms of simultaneous coactivation of a group of muscles during gait (37)(38)(39). The RMS revealed differences between the same muscles of different limbs, although the one-way ANOVA did not reveal statistical significance.…”
Section: Semg Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 97%