1993
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0442(1993)006<1301:gopftm>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global Oceanic Precipitation from the MSU during 1979—91 and Comparisons to Other Climatologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
184
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 307 publications
(192 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
8
184
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The teleconnection is such that Indian monsoon rainfall tends to be (Fig. 2a), the pattern correlation with MSU/raingauge data (Schemm et al 1992, Spencer 1993 in the vicinity of India is only slightly higher (0.60 vs. 0.55) relative to the original models that did not to simulate the observed teleconnection (Fig. 2b).…”
Section: Mean State Versus Interannual Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The teleconnection is such that Indian monsoon rainfall tends to be (Fig. 2a), the pattern correlation with MSU/raingauge data (Schemm et al 1992, Spencer 1993 in the vicinity of India is only slightly higher (0.60 vs. 0.55) relative to the original models that did not to simulate the observed teleconnection (Fig. 2b).…”
Section: Mean State Versus Interannual Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 76%
“…However, it uses a different data blending methodology than GPCP and incorporates OLR measurements and a modified version of precipitation estimates from an MSU channel 1 algorithm [Spencer, 1993]. Table i …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, we acquired and analyzed the following gridded monthly observed precipitation data sets: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Land Precipitation (NOAA PREC/L; Chen et al, 2002); National Aeronautics and Space Administration Global Precipitation Climatology Project (NASA GPCP; Adler et al, 2003); NASA Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (NASA TRMM; Huffman et al, 2007); NOAA Climate Prediction Center Merged Analysis of Precipitation (CPC CMAP; Xie and Arkin, 1997); Microwave Sounding Unit (MSU; Spencer, 1993); University of East Anglia-Climate Research Unit (UEA-CRU) Global (Hulme, 1992) and v.TS2.1 (Mitchell and Jones, 2005); University of Delaware (UDEL; Willmott and Matsuura, 1995); Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) v.0605 and v.0705; German Climate Research Program (DEKLIM; Beck et al, 2005); NOAA Climate Anomaly Monitoring System (CAMS; Janowiak and Xie, 1999); and NOAA CPC Morphing Technique (CMORPH; Joyce et al, 2004). For brevity, we do not show the results from all data sets in this paper.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%