Global-scale analysis of river flow alterations due to water withdrawals and reservoirs

Abstract

Global-scale information on natural river flows and anthropogenic river flow alterations is required to identify areas where aqueous ecosystems are expected to be strongly degraded. Such information can support the identification of environmental flow guidelines and a sustainable water management that balances the water demands of humans and ecosystems. This study presents the first global assessment of the anthropogenic alteration of river flow regimes, in particular of flow variability, by water withdrawals and dams/reservoirs. Six ecologically relevant flow indicators were quantified using an improved version of the global water model WaterGAP. WaterGAP simulated, with a spatial resolution of 0.5 degree, river discharge as affected by human water withdrawals and dams around the year 2000, as well as naturalized discharge without this type of human interference. Compared to naturalized conditions, long-term average global discharge into oceans and internal sinks has decreased by 2.7% due to water withdrawals, and by 0.8% due to dams. Mainly due to irrigation, long-term average river discharge and statistical low flow Q 90 (monthly river discharge that is exceeded in 9 out of 10 months) have decreased by more than 10% on one sixth and one quarter of the global land area (excluding Antarctica and Greenland), respectively. Q 90 has increased significantly on only 5% of the land area, downstream of reservoirs. Due to both water withdrawals and reservoirs, seasonal flow amplitude has decreased significantly on one sixth of the land area, while interannual variability has increased on one quarter of the land area mainly due to irrigation. It has decreased on only 8% of the land area, in areas downstream of reservoirs where consumptive water use is low. The impact of reservoirs is likely underestimated by our study as small reservoirs are not taken into account. Areas most affected by anthropogenic river Correspondence to: P. Döll

Understanding terrestrial water storage variations in northern latitudes across scales

“…This ensemble includes HTESSEL-CaMa (Balsamo et al, 2009), JULES Clark et al, 2011), LISFLOOD (van der Knijff et al, 2010), ORCHIDEE (Krinner et al, 2005;Ngo-Duc et al, 2007;d'Orgeval et al, 2008), SURFEX-TRIP (Alkama et al, 2010;Decharme et al, 2013), W3RA (van Dijk andWarren, 2010;van Dijk et al, 2014), WaterGAP3 (Flörke et al, 2013;Döll et al, 2009), PCR-GLOBWB (van Beek et al, 2011Wada et al, 2014), and SWBM (Orth et al, 2013). For consistency, we processed the model estimates in the same manner as our model simulations to directly compare modelled SWE and TWS to observations from GlobSnow and GRACE, respectively.…”

Debates—Perspectives on socio‐hydrology: Socio‐hydrologic modeling: Tradeoffs, hypothesis testing, and validation

“…In the process, they have led to fragmented river systems with impacts on the hydrologic cycle [Graf, 1999]. Globally, water withdrawals and reservoirs have decreased annual discharge to the oceans by 2.7% with significant changes to the seasonal cycle of streamflow [Doll et al, 2009].…”

Hydrological monitoring and seasonal forecasting: Progress and perspectives

“…Ensemble forecasting approach has not only been used to develop multi-model predictions, it is also a popular approach in treating uncertainties from different sources, including model inputs, ICs, and model parameters. To date, human activities are posing significant influence to terrestrial water cycle (Gerten et al, 2008) directly by water withdrawals, like crop irrigation (Tang et al, 2008;Leng et al, 2013), reservoir regulation (Döll et al, 2009) and groundwater pumping (Leng et al, 2014;Ferguson and Maxwell, 2012) and indirectly by altering the land cover (VanShaar et al, 2002). How to effectively parameterize such human interventions into land surface hydrological models is of critical importance for an improved knowledge of terrestrial hydrological variations under a changing environment.…”