2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.01.23.477429
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global success in oyster reef restoration despite ongoing recovery debt

Abstract: Habitat destruction and biodiversity loss from exploitation of ecosystems have led to increased restoration and conservation efforts worldwide. Disturbed ecosystems accumulate a recovery debt - the accumulated loss of ecosystem services - and quantifying this debt presents a valuable tool to develop better ecosystem restoration practices. Here, we quantified the ongoing recovery debt following structural restoration of oyster habitats, one of the most degraded marine ecosystems worldwide. We found that whilst … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 60 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, given a limited amount of restoration substrate, restoration designs could be prioritized by their ability to meet criteria such as maximizing reef area available to be settled by oysters, or increasing reef height to potentially avoid deleterious conditions (e.g., hypoxia) and be exposed to favorable conditions (e.g., increased food quality) associated with deeper water (Breitburg et al, 2000). Whereas low-relief reef designs can be beneficial in increasing the restoration footprint and meeting largescale ecosystem restoration goals (e.g., La Peyre et al, 2022;Hemraj et al, 2022), decreasing the areal footprint in exchange for increasing reef height can enhance ecological benefits and habitat resilience (Lenihan, 1999;Tolley and Volety, 2005;Powers et al, 2009;Gregalis et al, 2009;Schulte et al, 2009;Powell et al, 2012;Colden et al, 2017;Peters et al, 2017). In this study, we evaluate habitat provision for oysters and motile reef-resident fauna on highand low-relief restored oyster reefs for 36 months after reef construction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, given a limited amount of restoration substrate, restoration designs could be prioritized by their ability to meet criteria such as maximizing reef area available to be settled by oysters, or increasing reef height to potentially avoid deleterious conditions (e.g., hypoxia) and be exposed to favorable conditions (e.g., increased food quality) associated with deeper water (Breitburg et al, 2000). Whereas low-relief reef designs can be beneficial in increasing the restoration footprint and meeting largescale ecosystem restoration goals (e.g., La Peyre et al, 2022;Hemraj et al, 2022), decreasing the areal footprint in exchange for increasing reef height can enhance ecological benefits and habitat resilience (Lenihan, 1999;Tolley and Volety, 2005;Powers et al, 2009;Gregalis et al, 2009;Schulte et al, 2009;Powell et al, 2012;Colden et al, 2017;Peters et al, 2017). In this study, we evaluate habitat provision for oysters and motile reef-resident fauna on highand low-relief restored oyster reefs for 36 months after reef construction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%