“…For example, given a limited amount of restoration substrate, restoration designs could be prioritized by their ability to meet criteria such as maximizing reef area available to be settled by oysters, or increasing reef height to potentially avoid deleterious conditions (e.g., hypoxia) and be exposed to favorable conditions (e.g., increased food quality) associated with deeper water (Breitburg et al, 2000). Whereas low-relief reef designs can be beneficial in increasing the restoration footprint and meeting largescale ecosystem restoration goals (e.g., La Peyre et al, 2022;Hemraj et al, 2022), decreasing the areal footprint in exchange for increasing reef height can enhance ecological benefits and habitat resilience (Lenihan, 1999;Tolley and Volety, 2005;Powers et al, 2009;Gregalis et al, 2009;Schulte et al, 2009;Powell et al, 2012;Colden et al, 2017;Peters et al, 2017). In this study, we evaluate habitat provision for oysters and motile reef-resident fauna on highand low-relief restored oyster reefs for 36 months after reef construction.…”