2011
DOI: 10.1093/cid/cir897
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

 -Glucan Antigenemia Assay for the Diagnosis of Invasive Fungal Infections in Patients With Hematological Malignancies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies From the Third European Conference on Infections in Leukemia (ECIL-3)

Abstract: Different BG assays have similar accuracy for the diagnosis of IFI in hemato-oncological patients. Two consecutive positive antigenemia assays have very high specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. Because sensitivity is low, the test needs to be combined with clinical, radiological, and microbiological findings.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
163
2
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 260 publications
(179 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
8
163
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Sensitivities are higher for infections caused by C. albicans than by other Candida species. Commercially available BDG assays had sensitivities of 73-75% and specificities of 97% for the diagnosis of probable or proven Candida infections [35].…”
Section: Invasive Candidiasismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensitivities are higher for infections caused by C. albicans than by other Candida species. Commercially available BDG assays had sensitivities of 73-75% and specificities of 97% for the diagnosis of probable or proven Candida infections [35].…”
Section: Invasive Candidiasismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to variable sensitivity, specificity and predictive values, the BG test should be used for clinical management decisions in conjunction with clinical, microbiological and radiological findings. 27 Additional analyses are needed to determine the optimal cutoff values and the number of positive samples defining a positive test. Performance analyses should be investigated in cohort studies that better reflect the utility of the test in populations targeted in its real-life clinical application.…”
Section: Biological Factors Epidemiological Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Issues regarding the technical complexity of the assay and the cost-effectiveness of its use should also be considered for its real-time implementation for guiding clinical management. 27 …”
Section: Biological Factors Epidemiological Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…61,62 With respect to serum BDG and GM assays, several meta-analyses have noted heterogeneity of results attributed to differences in study design, patient populations (e.g., hematologic vs other), the criteria used to define a positive test, and the definition of IA. [63][64][65][66][67][68] Among highrisk patients with hematologic malignancies and chemotherapy-induced neutropenia or allogeneic HCT, both tests share a similar sensitivity of 60%-80% and specificity of 90% and higher. 69 There may also be a role for combining serum BDG and GM screening in high-risk neutropenic patients.…”
Section: Improving Diagnosis Of Invasive Aspergillosismentioning
confidence: 99%