2015
DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.2462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glycated Hemoglobin Level and Risk of Hip Fracture in Older People with Type 2 Diabetes: A Competing Risk Analysis of Taiwan Diabetes Cohort Study

Abstract: Hip fracture, which is associated with substantial morbidity and long-term mortality, imposes a major burden on the healthcare system. Diabetes is a risk factor for osteoporosis, which is a crucial risk factor of hip fracture. However, epidemiological studies investigating the risk of hip fracture among patients with type 2 diabetes are limited. This study explored the association between hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and the risk of hip fracture in people with type 2 diabetes aged 65 years and older. We conducted a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
93
2
7

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
8
93
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In the largest study, based in Taiwan, with 1514 hip fracture cases in T2D patients, those with baseline A1C levels of 9-10% (HR = 1.24; 1.02-1.49) and 10% + (HR = 1.32; 1.09-1.58) had higher hip fracture rates compared with A1C levels of 6-7% (Fig. 3) [73].There was a suggestion of a higher rate in those with A1C b 6% (HR = 1.19; 0.97-1.45) compared with 6-7%, but the difference was not statistically significant. Those with a baseline A1C of 7-8% had a slight increase in hip fracture (HR = 1.07; 0.92-1.25) compared with A1C of 6-7%.…”
Section: Glycemic Control and Fracture Riskmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the largest study, based in Taiwan, with 1514 hip fracture cases in T2D patients, those with baseline A1C levels of 9-10% (HR = 1.24; 1.02-1.49) and 10% + (HR = 1.32; 1.09-1.58) had higher hip fracture rates compared with A1C levels of 6-7% (Fig. 3) [73].There was a suggestion of a higher rate in those with A1C b 6% (HR = 1.19; 0.97-1.45) compared with 6-7%, but the difference was not statistically significant. Those with a baseline A1C of 7-8% had a slight increase in hip fracture (HR = 1.07; 0.92-1.25) compared with A1C of 6-7%.…”
Section: Glycemic Control and Fracture Riskmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…However, this trial cannot determine whether poor glycemic control has an effect on these outcomes. Several longitudinal observational studies are now available that have directly addressed this issue [73][74][75][76]. In the largest study, based in Taiwan, with 1514 hip fracture cases in T2D patients, those with baseline A1C levels of 9-10% (HR = 1.24; 1.02-1.49) and 10% + (HR = 1.32; 1.09-1.58) had higher hip fracture rates compared with A1C levels of 6-7% (Fig.…”
Section: Glycemic Control and Fracture Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study in 18 patients with type 1 diabetes did not show any differences in bone turnover compared to non-diabetes subjects (7). These patients were well controlled with a mean HbA1c of 6.8% (7), which may influence the results as the fracture risk is highest in patients with HbA1c levels above 9% (39).…”
Section: Total (95% Ci)mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…В настоящем исследовании различий по уровню гликированного гемоглобина у пациентов с переломами и без выявлено не было. Однако в одной из работ плохая компенсация СД была фактором риска переломов [19]. Дополнительным фактором риска переломов считается дефицит инсулина [20].…”
Section: сахарный диабет Diabetes Mellitusunclassified