2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-44638-3_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Goal-Driven Structured Argumentation for Patient Management in a Multimorbidity Setting

Abstract: We use computational argumentation to both analyse and generate solutions for reasoning in multimorbidity about consistent recommendations, according to different patient-centric goals. Reasoning in this setting carries a complexity related to the multiple variables involved. These variables reflect the co-existing health conditions that should be considered when defining a proper therapy. However, current Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSSs) are not equipped to deal with such a situation. They do not go … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, Oliveira et al (2020) further improved CompGuide to include computational argumentation. This last step is useful when reasoning in cases of multimorbidity.…”
Section: Compguidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Oliveira et al (2020) further improved CompGuide to include computational argumentation. This last step is useful when reasoning in cases of multimorbidity.…”
Section: Compguidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…How to best use argumentation theory to generate understandable explanations has become an increasingly important topic in AI regulation and AI design. There have been works [4,7] discussing which standards should an argumentation-based explanation meet and some formal explanations [7,10,18] for different argumentation frameworks are given. For legal systems, users may need explanations with understandable legal information for the acceptance of certain assertions, rather than the acceptance of a set of design elements.…”
Section: Giving Legal Explanationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2018), Čyras and Oliveira (2019), Oliveira et al . (2018), the authors translate clinical evidence into arguments for an ABA and track patients health state to suggest a treatment in an emergency scenario. Due to the probability distribution which is part of the framework, an ABA which can handle uncertainty can tackle the demands of stochastic framework.…”
Section: Argumentation and Explainable Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%