2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GOALDS—Goal Based Damage Ship Stability and safety standards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the A-index can provide a very conservative measure of survivability. Alternative s-factor formulations have been presented by Papanikolaou et al (2013) and Cichowicz et al (2016). Still the SOLAS formulae are widely used.…”
Section: Concept Of Survivabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, the A-index can provide a very conservative measure of survivability. Alternative s-factor formulations have been presented by Papanikolaou et al (2013) and Cichowicz et al (2016). Still the SOLAS formulae are widely used.…”
Section: Concept Of Survivabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the available statistics are not very comprehensive since accidents are fortunately rare. Pioneering work on grounding damages was carried out in the GOALDS, Papanikolaou et al (2013), and EMSA III projects, EMSA (2015). Since the SOLAS framework and the underlying probabilities are well established, the present study is limited to collision damages.…”
Section: Generalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, the costs incurred by a grounding are associated with ship repairs and operational delays, which might include steelwork repairs, outfitting harbour fees and additional fuel consumption (Papanikolaou et al, 2013). Costs may be excessive when a grounding occurs on a reef; damages potentially including reef restoration, structural solutions to repair natural breakwaters for the protection of coastlines sensitive to erosion, and restoration of the structural integrity and topographical complexity of reefs (Young et al, 2012).…”
Section: Risks Associated With Ship Groundingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…", while other suggested that the new regulations were more demanding (e.g., in terms of GM requirements than the SOLAS90 + Stockholm Agreement) for large RoPax ships while being generally less stringent for small ferries [4]. The latter observation was later "extrapolated" to all passenger vessels and common understanding was that the formula underestimates actual safety levels of large cruise vessels (the HARDER [5], sample of ships included two RoPax ships and one cruise liner) while the safety performance of RoPax ships may be seriously overrated [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%