2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-28948-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GOATOOLS: A Python library for Gene Ontology analyses

Abstract: The biological interpretation of gene lists with interesting shared properties, such as up- or down-regulation in a particular experiment, is typically accomplished using gene ontology enrichment analysis tools. Given a list of genes, a gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis may return hundreds of statistically significant GO results in a “flat” list, which can be challenging to summarize. It can also be difficult to keep pace with rapidly expanding biological knowledge, which often results in daily changes to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
647
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 886 publications
(648 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
647
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used the Python package ‘ goatools’ (Klopfenstein et al . ) to perform Fisher's exact tests on GO annotation terms found in clusters of significantly differentially expressed gene. Annotation of GO terms for each gene was based on the published transcriptome of S. solidus (Hébert et al .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We used the Python package ‘ goatools’ (Klopfenstein et al . ) to perform Fisher's exact tests on GO annotation terms found in clusters of significantly differentially expressed gene. Annotation of GO terms for each gene was based on the published transcriptome of S. solidus (Hébert et al .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We identified functional categories over-represented in each coexpression module to characterize the biological functions associated with each life stage. We used the Python package 'GOATOOLS' (Klopfenstein et al 2015) to perform Fisher's exact tests on GO annotation terms found in clusters of significantly differentially expressed gene. Annotation of GO terms for each gene was based on the published transcriptome of S. solidus (H ebert et al 2016b).…”
Section: Differential Expression Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DEGs were determined by controlling for false discovery rate (FDR) as implemented in deseq2 (Benjamini-Hochberg correction; Benjamini & Hochberg, 1995), with a threshold of a FDR < 0.05. Then, GO enrichment analysis was performed with GOATOOLS (Klopfenstein et al, 2018), based on Fisher's exact test. For all tested lists of genes, GO enrichment was associated with FDR < 0.05 (Benjamini & Hochberg, 1995) and a minimum of three genes represented per category.…”
Section: Differential Gene Expression Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gene ontology (GO) annotations were downloaded from the SGD database (Cherry et al, 2012), while the GO slim yeast dataset was downloaded from the gene ontology website (Ashburner et al, 2000;The Gene Ontology Consortium, 2017). GO term enrichments were assessed using goatools (Klopfenstein et al, 2018), v0.8.2, using a FDR-corrected P-value threshold of 0.01.…”
Section: Go Term Enrichment Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%