Gonad Radiation Dose from Diagnostic Procedures

Ardran, G. M.; Crooks, H. E.

doi:10.1259/0007-1285-30-354-295

Cited by 32 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…4 stem from investigators who showed that dose reduction was possible according to their standards. Braun [41] and Saupe [42] in 1928, Ardran and colleagues in 1938, 1939, 1953 and 1957 [43–45], Billings [46] in 1957 and Persliden [47] in 2002 belong to this group. Their doses are clearly not representative for the average practice at the time of reporting.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The skin dose of pelvic radiographs since 1896

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives To derive conversions of antiquated exposure data into modern equivalents and to apply these in the assessment of the skin dose of pelvic radiographs since 1896. Methods The literature 1896–2018 was searched for implicit and explicit dose information. The early implicit dose data contained now obsolete descriptions of radiation quality and quantity for long since disappeared X-ray systems of limited efficiency. Converting the old information into modern specifications was achieved using contemporary data and computer simulations. Final dose calculations were done with modern software. Explicit radiation doses of later date reported in old quantities and units were adapted according to current recommendations. Results For the period before 1927 conversion algorithms for spark gap data and penetrometer hardnesses to high voltage could be derived. Electrical and X-ray efficiencies of several old röntgen systems were determined. Together they allowed reconstruction of 53 doses. After 1927 doses were generally explicitly specified; 114 were retrieved. Although an enormous spread was observed, the average skin dose was reduced by a factor of about 400. Conclusions Antiquated exposure data were successfully used for dose reconstruction. Extreme dose variability was a constant. Efforts to cut down doses were effective as skin doses went down from sub-erythema values to about one milligray. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13244-019-0710-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The skin dose of pelvic radiographs since 1896

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Measurements in live subjects by readings from ionization chambers placed in the rectum or vagina or on the skin and deducing the dose to the ovaries from such data (HAMMER-JACOBSEN 1957, LARSSON 1958, SEELENTAG et coll. 1958, MOHR 1958, LÖSSL 1957, ADRAN and CROOKS 1957, SPIERS 1957, OSBORN 1959 A combination of these methods has been chosen by several of the authors quoted above.…”

Section: Determination Of the Ovary Dose In Diagnosticmentioning

confidence: 99%