Google, Facebook and what else? Measuring the hybridity of Italian journalists by their use of sources

Abstract

The contemporary media systems present hybrid logics and features that imply an increasingly interdependence among actors, media and communication formats. The hybrid media system approach underlines that legacy news media and non-elite media actors construct flows of news through different media technologies and according to complex temporal structures. A media environment arises in which traditional distinctions between concepts like ‘online’ and ‘offline’, ‘producer’ and ‘audience’, ‘citizens’ and ‘journalists’ become blurred. The emphasis appears to be on change more than continuity, and on difference more than similarity. Although the hybrid media approach is appreciated by numerous contemporary media scholars, hybridity in media often remains an all-encompassing concept and few attempts have been made to measure it. This article assesses the level of hybridity by investigating journalists’ uses of sources. It considers mainly journalists’ use of sources by the medium for which they work (from newspapers to web or radio) and the kinds of news that they produce (hard or soft news, business/finance, tech/science). The assumption is, therefore, that, within a homogeneously hybridized media system, journalists use the same sources regardless of the medium for which they work and the topics with which they deal. This objective is pursued by analysing the data collected via a survey conducted by means of structured interviews with a sample of 1424 Italian journalists between October and November 2016. The findings show that the analytical distinction among platforms for which journalists work still matters in terms of sources. Except for the use of Facebook and Google, journalists have still very defined paths to collect sources according to the medium they work for. The article has implications also for the literature on journalists’ authority and expertise.

JASIST Special Issue Editorial: Re‐orienting search engine research in information science

“…Some studies look at specific groups, such as teenagers (Andersson, 2017), older people (Sanchiz et al, 2017), or specific social settings or professions (Gudmundsdottir & Hatlevik, 2020). Others focus on the use of search engines in relation to other platforms, such as social media (see, e.g., Delmastro & Splendore, 2021).…”

Influences of Media Routines on Fact-Checking:

“…News organizations have a "preferred orientation toward" officials associated with powerful institutions such as government, law enforcement agencies, universities, businesses, and interest groups (Cross, 2010, p. 414). Research shows that people who have the most power in society define issues and events covered in the news (Delmastro & Splendore, 2020;Gans, 1979;Hall et al, 2013).…”