Governança judicial: proposta de modelo teórico-metodológico

Akutsu, Luiz; Guimarães, Tomás de Aquino

doi:10.1590/0034-7612116774

Cited by 18 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Conforme mencionado na seção 2.2, considerando a revisão da literatura, bem como a análise documental da legislação pertinente, recorreu-se -para elaborar a definição constitutiva do construto a ser medido no instrumento em construção -à definição de governança (Hufty, 2011), de governança pública (Osborne, 2010;Akutsu;Guimarães, 2015) e de governança educacional (Ostrom, 2010;Osborne, 2010;Honig, 2006;Peters, 2012). As definições constitutivas do processo, isto é, os conceitos de cada uma das dimensões do modelo GAF foram aquelas consolidadas na Figura 1 (cf.…”

Section: Metodologiaunclassified

Construção De Um Instrumento De Medida Da Governança Na Educação Básica Do Brasil

Oliveira

Nunes

Guerra

2020

Contab. Vista & Rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Com foco na governança aplicada à educação básica, mais especificamente ao processo de governança educacional, o presente estudo descreve a criação de um instrumento de avaliação da educação brasileira. Baseado no modelo Governance Analytical Framework [GAF] de Hufty (2011), e na metodologia de Pasquali (2009) para construção e validação de instrumento de avaliação, a presente pesquisa envolveu: (i) a delimitação do objeto e atributos medidos pelo instrumento; (ii) a definição constitutiva e a definição operacional do construto “governança educacional”; (iii) elaboração dos itens; e (iv) análise teórica dos itens. Consideraram-se a revisão da literatura e a análise da legislação pertinente, para elaborar a definição constitutiva do construto a ser medido no instrumento. Posteriormente, realizou-se (i) a análise teórica dos itens, por meio de entrevistas a grupos focais, e (ii) a aplicação do instrumento-piloto, sendo consolidada a versão final em 25 itens de avaliação. Considerando a exiguidade de pesquisas empíricas sobre governança nos sistemas de educação básica, principalmente no Brasil, o presente estudo traz válidas contribuições teóricas e práticas para esse campo de investigação. Especialmente, o instrumento proposto pode ser utilizado, após validação empírica por análise fatorial, para construção de indicadores globais dos Objetivos de Desenvolvimento Sustentável [ODS], em especial do ODS nº 4.

show abstract

Section: Metodologiaunclassified

Construção De Um Instrumento De Medida Da Governança Na Educação Básica Do Brasil

Oliveira

Nunes

Guerra

2020

Contab. Vista & Rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Therefore, judicial governance needs to be understood from its own characteristics, different from those that apply enterprises and public administration in general, or even as a "tool for the democratization of the judiciary" (Tavares & Barbosa, 2016, p. 45). Emerging efforts on the topic in the field of management were summarized by Akutsu and Guimarães (2015) who suggested five dimensions of judicial governance: judicial performance; judicial independence; accountability and strategic resources of the judiciary; accessibility to justice; and structure of the judiciary. These authors also propose three levels of analysis to study judicial governance: institutional, organizational, and individual, with the goal of improving performance standards (Akutsu & Guimarães, 2015).…”

Section: Governance In the Context Of Courtsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Emerging efforts on the topic in the field of management were summarized by Akutsu and Guimarães (2015) who suggested five dimensions of judicial governance: judicial performance; judicial independence; accountability and strategic resources of the judiciary; accessibility to justice; and structure of the judiciary. These authors also propose three levels of analysis to study judicial governance: institutional, organizational, and individual, with the goal of improving performance standards (Akutsu & Guimarães, 2015). Their approach to judicial governance makes important points.…”

Section: Governance In the Context Of Courtsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Courts as Organizations: Governance and Legitimacy

Guimarães

Guarido

Luz

2020

BAR, Braz. Adm. Rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The interdependence between governance and legitimacy of the courts is a subject that has not been much studied by scholars, especially those from the fields of public administration and organizational studies. Taking into account the importance of these topics for the functioning of these organizations, the purpose of this essay is twofold: to enrich the debate on the contribution of good governance to the legitimacy of courts, and to encourage researchers to address these themes in greater depth. To this end, the main literature on governance and legitimacy of courts is analyzed. Theoretical approaches contribute to the discussion of the functioning of courts, which are highly institutionalized organizations that depend heavily on a presumption of legitimacy. Ensuring this legitimacy has been one of the challenges for these organizations, which are required to adopt governance models that contribute to better management and performance. We argue that there are managerial and substantive implications for society, since the governance and legitimacy of courts can affect the system of justice. We put forward some propositions on the influence of judicial governance on the legitimacy of the justice system and on the perception of legitimacy of the courts. These propositions provide insights for a research agenda on these issues.

show abstract

“…These approaches are useful, for example, for research related to governance and performance of courts and other justice system organizations. Guimaraes et al (2011); Akutsu and Guimaraes (2015), Gomes et al (2016); Sousa and Guimaraes (2017) and Gomes et al (2017) have all applied these theories in research into judicial administration.…”

Section: Theoretical Lenses and The Research Agendamentioning

confidence: 99%

Administration of justice: an emerging research field

Guimarães

Gomes

Filho

2018

RAUSP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to discuss the concept of Administration of Justice as a research field and set out an agenda for future studies that could promote the production of scientific knowledge in this area. Design/methodology/approach This paper explores the idiosyncratic features, dimensions of analysis upon the Administration of Justice, states a research agenda and discusses the main challenges on this theme. This paper conceptualizes Administration of Justice as a research field and discusses related phenomena from institutional and economic perspectives on innovation, performance, governance and legitimacy. Findings As a research field, Administration of Justice is defined as a set of theoretical concepts, research methods and techniques, aiming to investigate the management processes associated with the use and articulation of resources, knowledge and institutions, at different levels of the justice system, and their influence on the provision of justice in a given social context. As social phenomena, four levels of analysis are proper to investigate the justice system: societal, inter-organizational, organizational and operational. Innovation, performance, governance and legitimacy are central themes of the Administration of Justice and present various gaps and research opportunities. Research limitations/implications The main implications is the proposal of an agenda for future studies on the Administration of Justice field, which is an important step in raising awareness of the issue. Originality/value Administration of Justice encompasses a growing interest among academics, justice practitioners and public managers regarding managerial and political practices carried out in the justice system. Although relevant, this subject has been scarcely studied by the management community. This paper invites community to adopt an organizational and institutional perspective to Administration of Justice, setting an agenda for future research.

show abstract

Governança judicial: proposta de modelo teórico-metodológico

Cited by 18 publications

References 32 publications

Construção De Um Instrumento De Medida Da Governança Na Educação Básica Do Brasil

Construção De Um Instrumento De Medida Da Governança Na Educação Básica Do Brasil

Courts as Organizations: Governance and Legitimacy

Administration of justice: an emerging research field

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About