2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2019.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Governance and control in distributed ledgers: Understanding the challenges facing blockchain technology in financial services

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
133
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 214 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
133
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The hacking and bankruptcy of the DAO and the implications that this event had for the underlying Ethereum blockchain network has fostered what is probably the most interesting and prolific strand of critiques to the assumption of decentralization. An increasing amount of recent works have focussed on the governance of blockchain networks and on their inherent problems and failures (Arrunada, 2018;De Filippi and Loveluck, 2016;Dupont, 2018;Finck, 2019: chapter 8;Hsieh et al, 2018;John and Pam, 2018;Miscione et al, 2018 andMusiani et al, 2018;Reijers et al, 2016;Walch, 2015 andZachariadis et al, 2019;Ziolkowski et al, 2019). These works have mainly compared the problems emerging from blockchain governance to the governance of digital platforms and, especially, of digital infrastructures.…”
Section: Critiquing Decentralization In Blockchain Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The hacking and bankruptcy of the DAO and the implications that this event had for the underlying Ethereum blockchain network has fostered what is probably the most interesting and prolific strand of critiques to the assumption of decentralization. An increasing amount of recent works have focussed on the governance of blockchain networks and on their inherent problems and failures (Arrunada, 2018;De Filippi and Loveluck, 2016;Dupont, 2018;Finck, 2019: chapter 8;Hsieh et al, 2018;John and Pam, 2018;Miscione et al, 2018 andMusiani et al, 2018;Reijers et al, 2016;Walch, 2015 andZachariadis et al, 2019;Ziolkowski et al, 2019). These works have mainly compared the problems emerging from blockchain governance to the governance of digital platforms and, especially, of digital infrastructures.…”
Section: Critiquing Decentralization In Blockchain Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This governance conundrum is not limited to the Ethereum community. Many other blockchain communities are currently experiencing "governance crises" derived from the need to update and change their respective protocols in response to a variety of urgent and pressing issues, such as: 1) ensuring sufficient performance when scaling the network; 2) ensuring that the blockchain consensus mechanism can resist the advantages of ASIC mining equipment; 3) the environmental impact of cryptocurrency mining; 4) the interconnection and interoperability of different blockchain networks, and 5) the privacy in exchange of tokens (for a similar list of challenges, see Zachariadis et al, 2019). This has fostered an emerging fierce debate over the meaning and the nature of blockchain governance much beyond academia, and even among the various members of these communities (Buterin, 2017b and.…”
Section: Critiquing Decentralization In Blockchain Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations