Governing Public-Private Partnerships: The Problem of Low-Cost Decisions

Abstract

In many cases, the expected efficiency advantages of public-private partnership (PPP) projects as a specific form of infrastructure provision did not materialize ex post. From a Public Choice perspective, one simple explanation for many of the problems surrounded by the governance of PPPs is that the public decision-makers being involved in the process of initiating and implementing PPP projects (namely, politicians and public bureaucrats) in many situations make low- cost decisions in the sense of Kirchgässner (1948–2017). That is, their decisions may have a high impact on the wealth of the jurisdiction in which the PPP is located (most notably, on the welfare of citizen-taxpayers in this jurisdiction) but, at the same time, these decisions often only have a low impact on the private welfare of the individual decision-makers in politics and bureaucracy. The latter, for example, in many settings often have a low economic incentive to monitor/control what the private-sector partners are doing (or not doing) within a PPP arrangement. The purpose of this paper is to draw greater attention to the problems created by low-cost decisions for the governance of PPPs. Moreover, the paper discusses potential remedies arising from the viewpoint of Public Choice and Constitutional Political Economy.

Critical success factors for development of public-private-partnership airports in India

“…The structuring of a PPP is quite complex due to the involvement of a large number of parties having different interests in the same project and their multiple relationships (Yescombe, 2007). The implementation of PPP is beneficial for the private partners, as well as for the society located in the area where the PPP project is executed (Mause, 2019). Conversely, the private partner carries substantial risks, along with management responsibility, while the government body takes part as a partner or the regulator in the PPP.…”

Housing and Jobs: Investigating the Geographic Variance of Housing Vouchers in Metropolitan Regions

“…The response from the public, private, and nonprofit sectors help identify factors involved in the evolution of the voucher. Public-private partnerships provide a low-cost solution to public partners (Mause, 2019). The voucher program allows private-sector landlords to contract services once managed by public housing authorities.…”