Governmentalities without policy capacity

Abstract

The professional community of policy experts takes it for granted that all governments seek to strengthen their policy capacity, considering it a key indicator and requisite of their success. Yet this assumption is far from universal, even in some European Union countries with long and complex institutional histories. If we look at the informed and explicit use of policy analysis tools in France, Germany, Spain, and Italy, we have to conclude that this paradigm is not completely integrated into their governmentality. In these countries, three disciplinary approaches warrant especial attention as generators of competencies recognized as usable knowledge for public decisions: 'law,' 'public finance' and 'public administration.' Where the standard operating procedures of democratic institutions appear to be fully defined on the basis of these three categories, the inclusion of the policy perspective encounters major difficulties. In these contexts, the most important obstacle is the fear that the new paradigm will threaten the balance among the constitutional bodies, especially to the detriment of the legislature, and that it will constrict the political leadership. This explains why some countries, such as France and, most recently, Italy, have attempted to resolve the impasse by resorting to the strongest of legitimations: inclusion in their constitutions of public policy evaluation as a function of Parliament. This choice is certainly important, but in itself it does not guarantee recognition of the policy paradigm as a science for democratic institutions.

Deciding for tomorrow, today : what makes governmental decisions about water infrastructure forward looking?

“…2. Medium-to-large municipalities with high organizational analytical capacity are clearly able to keep long-term non-urgent problems on the agenda of decision makers, as indicated by both our results (configuration 1) and existing studies (Mintrom & Luetjens, 2017;Regonini, 2017). Forward-looking decisions could therefore benefit from depoliticization towards more technocratic arenas, or urban partnerships in the case of stable situations (Marshall & Cowell, 2016;Taylor & Harman, 2016).…”

A Behavioral Design to Reform Italy’s Evaluation Policy

“…Building upon these findings (see also Marra, 2017Marra, , 2019, I provide behavioral insights on Italy's performance regimes and suggest a behavioral design to reform Italy's evaluation policy (James et al, 2020;Regonini, 2017).…”

The amparo procedure at the Constitutional Court of Spain: experience for Ukraine

“…У практиці Європейського суду з прав людини зустрічаються справи за скаргами громадян Іспанії про втручання в їх зазначені права [9]. Так, цей Суд у рішенні від 23 червня 1993 р. констатував, що в Іспанії відсутній прямий доступ фізичних осіб до КС для оскарження втручання в їхнє право власності, є тільки непрямий -через суди загальної юрисдикції [8] Відповідно до закону засідання Суду проводиться протягом 20 днів, в процесі надо вписать і його представляються необхідні аргументи в письмовій формі.…”