1973
DOI: 10.1016/s0033-7560(73)80014-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grain yield mutations induced by ethyl methanesulfonate treatment of oat seeds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One out of 160 EMS-induced mutant lines proved to have a positive deviation for grain yield as compared to the mother variety (Arias and Frey 1973).…”
Section: A Vena Sativamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One out of 160 EMS-induced mutant lines proved to have a positive deviation for grain yield as compared to the mother variety (Arias and Frey 1973).…”
Section: A Vena Sativamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These mutagens were effective in inducing variability for heading date, plant height, and spike length in wheat (Khadr and Shukry, 1972), and the induced variability generally was distributed equally around the check population mean. Arias and Prey (1973) Borojevic (1965Borojevic ( , 1966Borojevic ( , 1969Borojevic ( . and 1971 Several researchers (Borojevic, 1965: Wellensiek, 1965and Gaul, 1970) have postulated that sterility may contribute to the general reduction in mean yield associated with mutagen treatment.…”
Section: Literature Review Factors Affecting Mutation Spectrum and Efmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arias and Prey (1973) For example, if a mutation for early maturity occurred in a check line with late maturity it is unlikely that it would be classified as a mutant for early maturity. In light of the genetic variation observed in P^, the number of mutants was also determined on the basis of the least significant differ ence (LSD).…”
Section: Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences within "pure line" cultivars have been found in oats by Arias and Frey (1973) and may be attributed to cumula tive mutations and/or outcrossing.…”
Section: Isopopulation Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%