2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpur.2014.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Graphs of finite measure

Abstract: We consider weighted graphs with an infinite set of vertices. We show that boundedness of all functions of finite energy can be seen as a notion of 'relative compactness' for such graphs and study sufficient and necessary conditions for this property in terms of various metrics. We then equip graphs satisfying this property with a finite measure and investigate the associated Laplacian and its semigroup. In this context, our results include the trace class property for the semigroup, uniqueness and existence o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
66
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(d) If we assume that ρ takes values in [0, ∞), then we can clearly replace the assumption that m( r B r (x 0 )) = ∞ with m(X) = ∞. The case when m(X) < ∞ is notably different; see [8] for more details.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(d) If we assume that ρ takes values in [0, ∞), then we can clearly replace the assumption that m( r B r (x 0 )) = ∞ with m(X) = ∞. The case when m(X) < ∞ is notably different; see [8] for more details.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The forms Q (D) and Q (N ) are of particular relevance in the theory of forms associated to graphs in the sense that a symmetric, closed quadratic form Q is associated to the graph if and only if Q (D) ⊆ Q ⊆ Q (N ) , see [19]. Here, we write…”
Section: Graphs and Diffusion On Discrete Measure Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the only assumption in [28, Definition 2.3.1] which is non-trivial to check is (RF04). This however follows by [11,Lemma 3.4]. On the other hand, a magnetic form Q (c) 0,θ , θ = 0, can not be extended to a resistance form since it violates the cut-off property (RF05).…”
Section: Remark 22mentioning
confidence: 99%