2022
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.106.064026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gravitational lensing, memory, and the Penrose limit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As in the parallel case, this also agrees with results in the literature for the ultraboost of Kerr orthogonal to the axis of rotation [21,23,54].…”
Section: Jhep02(2023)107supporting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As in the parallel case, this also agrees with results in the literature for the ultraboost of Kerr orthogonal to the axis of rotation [21,23,54].…”
Section: Jhep02(2023)107supporting
confidence: 91%
“…That is, just because the Born approximation is not totally physical doesn't mean that it cannot encode some of the classical spin effects associated with Kerr (cf., [53,[96][97][98][99][100][101][102]). By analogy, we saw that the ultraboost of Kerr orthogonal to the axis of rotation did not contain true spin effects, but a naive replacement rule nevertheless correctly reproduces the bending of light in the Kerr metric [54,55].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations