1938
DOI: 10.2183/pjab1912.14.170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gravity Anomalies and the Corresponding Subterranean Mass Distributions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

1959
1959
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Tsuboi & Fuchida (1937) have investigated the error which arises when such line sources are in reality of finite length. They found that if the actual length I of the line sources is about four times the depth of burial d the error from the infinite length assumption is roughly 10 per cent.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tsuboi & Fuchida (1937) have investigated the error which arises when such line sources are in reality of finite length. They found that if the actual length I of the line sources is about four times the depth of burial d the error from the infinite length assumption is roughly 10 per cent.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our model assumes that the observed magnetic anomaly field can be approximated by the field due to a buried uncorrelated magnetic line source distribution of infinite length. Tsuboi & Fuchida (1937) have investigated the error which arises when such line sources are in reality of finite length. They found that if the actual length I of the line sources is about four times the depth of burial d the error from the infinite length assumption is roughly 10 per cent.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the bodies of wavelengths longer than 160 km are compensated by the isostasy due to the variation of the crustal thickness (Tsuboi and Yamaguchi, 1940;Hagiwara, 1967), the Bouguer gravity anomalies longer than 160 km in wavelength should be related with the undulation of the Moho boundary. The Moho boundary also has been assumed to be the magnetic boundary; the layer beneath the Moho boundary is nonmagnetic in general (Wasilewski et al, 1979).…”
Section: Estimation Of P/j Ratio At the Moho Boundarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the discretized approximation, the multisolutions, the instability calculation and the interpolation estimation are considered in this method (Fedi & Florio, 2002;Ivan, 1994;Leao & Silva, 1989;Novák et al, 2001). Another utilizes the linear multiplicative algorithm based on the convolution in the frequency domain (Dean, 1958;Hughes, 1942;Tomoda & Aki, 1955;Tsuboi & Fuchida, 1937). However, its frequency downward continuation factor should be filtered or regularized to diminish the amplifying impact (Abedi et al, 2013;Clarke, 1969;Ferguson, 1988;Huestis & Parker, 1979;Lima et al, 2013;Pašteka et al, 2012;Pawlowski, 1995;Sebera et al, 2015;Tikhonov et al, 1977;Zhang et al, 2016), and moreover, appropriate…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%