Gravity field determination and characteristics: Retrospective and prospective

Abstract

Gravimetry has had a long history, using pendulums, torsion balances, and static spring gravimeters. Relative accuracy adequate for many geophysical problems was already attained by 1900, but it took another half century to build readily portable gravimeters. Calibration and datum definition remained problems until the 1970s when free-fall absolute gravimeters were developed that now have a precision of 10 -3 mGal. The problems of geographic inaccessibility and field party costs (notably in areas of greatest tectonic interest) are now being overcome by airborne gravimetry that has already achieved accuracies of 1-3 mGal with resolutions of 10 to 20 km. Satellite techniques are the best way to determine the long-wavelength variations of the gravity field. The resolution of the models has steadily improved with the number of satellites and the precision of the observations. The best current model includes tracking data from more than 30 satellites, satellite altimetry, and surface gravimetry and has a resolution of about 290 km (harmonic degree 70) with the most recent improvements coming from Doppler orbitography and radiopositioning integrated by satellite (DORIS) tracking of the SPOT 2 satellite and satellite laser ranging (SLR), DORIS, and Global Positioning System (GPS) tracking of the TOPEX/POSEIDON satellite. Meanwhile, radar altimetry has become the dominant technique to infer the marine geoid with a resolution of tens of kilometers or shorter. Similarly, the gravity fields of the Moon, Venus, and Mars have been determined to harmonic degrees 70, 75, and 50, respectively, although tracking limitations result in variations of spatial resolution. Modeling Earth's gravity field from the abundance of precise data has become an increasingly complex task, with which the development of computer capacity has kept pace. Contemporary solutions now entail about 10,000 parameters, half of them for effects other than the fixed gravity field of Earth. Temporal variations arising from tides have long been well modeled, and nontidal changes are now being identified. The improvement in gravitational models engendered corresponding advances in geophysical interpretation. Isostatic models were refined and expanded to account for regional thermal and tectonic histories. Interpretation of the long-wavelength gravity field determined by satellite techniques has been mainly in terms of plate tectonics as a manifestation of mantle convection. Gravity has been significant in inferring that there must be a large increase in viscosity with depth (most strongly, from the apparent slow sinking of subducted slabs). The prospects for increasing accuracy and resolution in the determination of Earth's gravity field rest primarily with the development of new measurement systems. Airborne gravimetry is taking promising new steps using GPS, but significant global model improvement awaits a dedicated satellite gravimetry system, and future satellite altimeter missions will do more for ocean dynamics studies than geoid improvement. Advances in ...

Joint altimetric and in-situ data assimilation using the GRACE mean dynamic topography: a 1993–1998 hindcast experiment in the Tropical Pacific Ocean

“…Over the past three decades, tracking data from certain satellite constellations have been used to study the Earth's gravity field, leading to substantial improvement in our knowledge of the geoid (Nerem et al 1995). While these conventional methods have provided accurate information, especially at long wavelengths (Lemoine et al 1998;Biancale et al 2000), they are not sufficiently accurate to provide the short wavelengths of the geoid required to evaluate a relevant MDT.…”

On the equivalence of spherical splines with least-squares collocation and Stokes’s formula for regional geoid computation

“…There exist several methods for approximating Earth's regional gravity field, of which integral formula solutions to geodetic boundary value problems and least-squares techniques have emerged as common approaches (Nerem et al 1995). A review and comparison of different regional gravity modeling concepts are given by Tscherning (1981).…”

Geodetic versus geophysical perspectives of the ‘gravity anomaly’

“…These are classified as satellite‐only models, derived from orbital analysis, combined models, derived from terrestrial gravimetry, satellite altimetry and orbital perturbations, or tailored models, where additional data are used to refine existing models (Kearsley & Forsberg 1990; Wenzel 1998). Lambeck & Coleman (1983), Nerem et al (1995), Rapp (1997a) and Featherstone (2002) review global geopotential models. These are likely to be improved significantly with the advent of dedicated satellite gravity field missions.…”