Green Finance, Chemical Fertilizer Use and Carbon Emissions from Agricultural Production

Abstract

This study aimed to understand green finance’s impact on fertilizer use and agricultural carbon emissions. We selected the macro panel data of 30 provinces (cities) in China from 2000 to 2019. The main research methods are standardized test framework (cross-sectional dependence, unit root and cointegration test), the latest causal test, impulse response, and variance decomposition analysis. Examined the long-term equilibrium relationship between green finance, fertilizer use, and agricultural carbon emissions. The results show: fertilizer consumption and agricultural carbon emissions have a positive correlation. However, green finance can significantly reduce agricultural carbon emissions. The causal test confirmed the bidirectional causal relationship between agricultural carbon emissions and fertilizer use. At the same time, verified one-way causality from green finance to both of them. Interpret the results of impulse response and variance decomposition analysis: among the changes in agricultural carbon emissions, chemical fertilizers contributed 2.45%, green finance contributed 4.34%. In addition, the contribution rate of green finance to chemical fertilizer changes reached 11.37%. Green finance will make a huge contribution to reducing fertilizer use and agricultural carbon emissions within a decade. The research conclusions provide an important scientific basis for China’s provinces (cities) to formulate carbon emission reduction policies. China has initially formed a policy system and market environment to support the development of green finance, in 2020, the “dual carbon” goal was formally proposed. In 2021, the national “14th Five-Year Plan” and the 2035 Vision Goals emphasized the importance of green finance. It plays an important supporting role in carbon emission reduction goals, and green finance has become an important pillar of national strategic goals.

How Do Green Finance and Energy Efficiency Mitigate Carbon Emissions Without Reducing Economic Growth in G7 Countries?

“…20% of the energy consumption can be saved if the DMU’s value equals 80% ( Xiong and Sun, 2022 ). An assessment of energy and environmental techniques ( Guo et al, 2022 ) is the sole focus of this article. For example, the efficiency of energy-related emissions is measured by Li et al (2022) .…”

Research on the Drivers of Agricultural Carbon Emissions and Decoupling Effects in Jiangsu Province, China

“…Agricultural production activities produce a large amount of greenhouse gases, and their impact is second only to industrial carbon emissions, making agricultural emission reductions imperative (Scuderi et al, 2021). Scholars have used Kaya constant equation, LMDI factor decomposition, STIRPAT model, Divisia index decomposition, ARDL model, VAR model, and GWR model to study the factors influencing agricultural carbon emissions (Li et al, 2014;Akram et al, 2019;Aziz et al, 2022;Yan et al, 2017;Koondhar et al, 2021;Guo et al, 2022;Han et al,2021). It was found that agricultural economic growth, the degree of agricultural disaster, the increase of GDP per capita and energy intensity have a certain promotion effect on agricultural carbon emissions, while factors such as agricultural technological progress, the structure and production efficiency of cropping industry, urbanization process, the size of agricultural labor force, the agglomeration of agricultural industry and the level of agricultural mechanization have a certain inhibiting effect on agricultural carbon emissions (Deng et al, 2021).…”

Does Cleaner Household Energy Promote Agricultural Green Production? Evidence from China

“…Household energy consumption and agricultural production are the two main sources of carbon emissions [ 1 , 2 ]. The long-term use of non-clean energy by households and traditional agricultural production practices produces large amounts of greenhouse gases, which are a major cause of frequent climate extremes [ 3 ].…”