2012
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grids of stellar models with rotation

Abstract: Context. In recent years, many very interesting observations have appeared concerning the positions of Wolf-Rayet (WR) stars in the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram (HRD), the number ratios of WR stars, the nature of Type Ibc supernova (SN) progenitors, long and soft gamma ray bursts (LGRB), and the frequency of these various types of explosive events. These observations represent key constraints on massive star evolution. Aims. We study, in the framework of the single-star evolutionary scenario, how rotation modif… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

26
364
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 305 publications
(394 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
26
364
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We deduce that an average WR phase duration of 0.25 Myr is necessary to sustain our estimated population, assuming a Kroupa IMF and a constant Milky Way star formation rate of 1.9 M⊙yr −1 . This is compatible with the WR phase duration in rotating stellar models at solar metallicity (Georgy et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We deduce that an average WR phase duration of 0.25 Myr is necessary to sustain our estimated population, assuming a Kroupa IMF and a constant Milky Way star formation rate of 1.9 M⊙yr −1 . This is compatible with the WR phase duration in rotating stellar models at solar metallicity (Georgy et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Taking the Milky Way SFR to be 1.9 M⊙yr −1 (Chomiuk & Povich 2011), adopting a three-part Kroupa IMF (Kroupa & Weidner 2003), and assuming only stars with an initial mass > 25 M⊙ experience a WR phase, our derived population can be reproduced with τWR ≃ 0.25 Myr. This result is broadly consistent with rotating (nonrotating) Geneva models at solar metallicity (Georgy et al 2012), which display τWR = 0.45 Myr (0.006 Myr) at Mi = 32 M⊙ increasing with mass to 0.9 Myr (0.4 Myr) at Mi = 120 M⊙. WR lifetimes as a result of binary evolution at solar metallicity are predicted to span τWR = 0.5 Myr at Mi = 30 M⊙ to 1.0 Myr at 120 M⊙ (Eldridge et al 2008).…”
Section: Expectations From Star Formation Argumentssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The current generation of Geneva evolutionary models Georgy et al 2012) predict that single rotating stars with initial masses (M ini ) in the range 8 M < ∼ M ini < ∼ 17 M end their lives as red supergiant (RSG) stars before a SN event of the type IIP (i.e., with H lines dominating the spectrum and a plateau in the lightcurve). This scenario is supported well by the observations of SN IIP progenitors in New evolution models and model spectra are only available at the CDS via anonymous ftp to cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr (130.79.128.5) or via http://cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/qcat?J/A+A/558/A131 pre-explosion images, which have been shown to be RSGs with 8.5 M < ∼ M ini < ∼ 16.5 M ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) They predict too high rotation for the young pulsars, about two orders of magnitude above what is observed [19,26]. On the other hand meridional currents have the following strong/weak points:…”
Section: Rotationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…• Weak points: 1) They predict a too high frequency of long soft GRBs (note that they would explain some GRB's observed to occur at high metallicities) [19,26]. 2) They predict too high rotation for the young pulsars, about two orders of magnitude above what is observed [19,26].…”
Section: Rotationmentioning
confidence: 99%