2011
DOI: 10.1109/tap.2011.2122299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ground Plane Boosters as a Compact Antenna Technology for Wireless Handheld Devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
77
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
77
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Among all the proposed structures, we choose a simple cuboid structure [5] to verify the usefulness of the . To validate this method, we change the position of the Booster along the short edge of the ground plane and then check Table 1 presents the results for the different positions, and we use to confirm that no meaningful change occurs in the distribution because of the change in location.…”
Section: The Booster Placement Casementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among all the proposed structures, we choose a simple cuboid structure [5] to verify the usefulness of the . To validate this method, we change the position of the Booster along the short edge of the ground plane and then check Table 1 presents the results for the different positions, and we use to confirm that no meaningful change occurs in the distribution because of the change in location.…”
Section: The Booster Placement Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [4], the position of dual antennas in a mobile terminal was determined based on CMA below the 1 GHz band. Further, in [5], a practical coupling structural concept, the Booster, was introduced to use CMA in a MIMO antenna design. [6] proposed the coupling structure for the current correlation coupling to be an exciter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To validate the usefulness of the RCS method, a non-resonant element of only 5 mm × 5 mm × 5 mm is used to excite two ground planes representative of a bar-type and a smartphone platform as described in the previous section [21][22][23]. As explained before, the RCS presents larger values in the low frequency region for the smartphone platform resulting at the end in a larger bandwidth of 26.3% (SWR ≤ 3) with respect to the 17.7% for the bar-type platform (Fig.…”
Section: Ground Plane Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This antenna-structure is then tuned to the intended frequency band using a matching network. Some examples of coupling element type antennas can be found in [7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%