2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11270-022-06022-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Groundwater Quality Evaluation and Analysis Technology Based on AHP-EWM-GRA and Its Application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assume that the objective weight determined by FA is W is and the subjective weight determined by AHP is W js . In order to align the degree of difference between the two weights with the degree of difference between their corresponding assignment coefficients, this study introduces EDF to determine the assignment coefficients for the subject‐objective weights and calculates the comprehensive weight W (Li et al, 2022). The main equations are as follows: {agoodbreak+bgoodbreak=112s=1n)(Wisgoodbreak−Wjs212goodbreak=agoodbreak−b Wgoodbreak=aWisgoodbreak+bWjs where a is the assignment coefficient for W is and b is the assignment coefficient for W js .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Assume that the objective weight determined by FA is W is and the subjective weight determined by AHP is W js . In order to align the degree of difference between the two weights with the degree of difference between their corresponding assignment coefficients, this study introduces EDF to determine the assignment coefficients for the subject‐objective weights and calculates the comprehensive weight W (Li et al, 2022). The main equations are as follows: {agoodbreak+bgoodbreak=112s=1n)(Wisgoodbreak−Wjs212goodbreak=agoodbreak−b Wgoodbreak=aWisgoodbreak+bWjs where a is the assignment coefficient for W is and b is the assignment coefficient for W js .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality of mine water obtained by PCA-FCE is higher than that of the water quality evaluation model in this study, while the evaluation results obtained by EWQI and CPI show that the mine water in the study area is all class V water. To verify the reliability of the evaluation results of the four methods on the water quality of the study area, they were examined through the level difference method (which means that the water quality classes obtained between different water quality evaluation models were subtracted from each other) (Li et al, 2022). The details are shown in Table 11.…”
Section: Discuss Comparative Analysis Of Water Quality Evaluation Res...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nyimbili integrated AHP with TOPSIS and GIS techniques in 7 for analyzing earthquake hazards. In 8 , weights of groundwater indicators, which are used for groundwater quality evaluation, were determined using AHP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, the assessment of water quality, whether through the Water Quality Index (WQI) in groundwater [6][7][8] or surface water [9,10], using neural networks and machine learning [11,12], or through mathematic models employing computer software are widely used to simulate hydrodynamics, dispersion, and kinetics of pollutants in the natural environment [13]. They allow for the simulation of water usage situations, defining the ability of assimilation through the limits of disposal of finding sources or for the extractions of certain outflows, in a manner that implies calculated risk about the deterioration of water quality according to legal standards [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%