2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2022.127630
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Group relations, resilience and the I Ching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To formalize the relations postulated, we propose quantifying resilience as the convex combination of R and A ^ , as proposed in (Schweitzer, 2022) and shown in Figure 3b:…”
Section: A New Resilience Measurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To formalize the relations postulated, we propose quantifying resilience as the convex combination of R and A ^ , as proposed in (Schweitzer, 2022) and shown in Figure 3b:…”
Section: A New Resilience Measurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because there is no general solution, we resort to some guiding examples. In the simplest case, importance is defined in the hierarchical structure of a team [148]. There are also ways to determine hierarchies based on interaction patterns.…”
Section: Quantifying Agent Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correcting for these shortcomings is an open discussion. As a possible alternative we have proposed a new weighted balance measure T ijk [143,148] that takes into account not only the signs and the weights of the signed relations, but also the impact of the agents involved in the triad. To determine the structural balance of the whole collective, we take the arithmetic mean, ⟨T ⟩ = ∑ T ijk N t , where N t = T ijk is the total number of triads in the network.…”
Section: Structural Robustnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation