2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.amar.2016.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Grouped random parameters bivariate probit analysis of perceived and observed aggressive driving behavior: A driving simulation study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
63
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to fixed parameters models assuming the same effects of factors on all observations, random parameters models can capture the observation-specific effects of factors on crash frequency and have also been widely applied in crash injury severity analyses (Russo et al, 2014;Zhao and Khattak, 2015, Behnood and Mannering, 2016, 2017a, 2017bNaik et al, 2016;Anderson and Hernandez, 2017;Fountas and Anastasopoulos, 2017;Seraneeprakarn et al, 2017) and crash rate analyses (Anastasopoulos, 2016). Especially, for the data where one entity has multiple observations, such as panel data, group-specific random parameters models may be adopted to account for heterogeneity among groups (Wu et al, 2013;Sarwar et al, 2017). More details about random parameters formulations can be seen in the study by Mannering et al (2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to fixed parameters models assuming the same effects of factors on all observations, random parameters models can capture the observation-specific effects of factors on crash frequency and have also been widely applied in crash injury severity analyses (Russo et al, 2014;Zhao and Khattak, 2015, Behnood and Mannering, 2016, 2017a, 2017bNaik et al, 2016;Anderson and Hernandez, 2017;Fountas and Anastasopoulos, 2017;Seraneeprakarn et al, 2017) and crash rate analyses (Anastasopoulos, 2016). Especially, for the data where one entity has multiple observations, such as panel data, group-specific random parameters models may be adopted to account for heterogeneity among groups (Wu et al, 2013;Sarwar et al, 2017). More details about random parameters formulations can be seen in the study by Mannering et al (2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an important consideration, as if unobserved heterogeneity is not addressed, the parameter estimates can be erroneous, the inferences inconsistent, and the forecasts inaccurate (Washington et al, 2011;Russo et al, 2014;Anastasopoulos and Mannering, 2016;Mannering et al, 2016;Sarwar et al, 2016Sarwar et al, , 2017. In random parameters modeling, the coefficients become:…”
Section: Methods and Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of traffic safety studies accounted for group effects (instead of site effects) in random effects, random parameters, and latent class modeling to capture variations in unknown/unmeasured factors that vary across groups (Wu et al, 2013;Heydari et al, 2014a;Heydari et al, 2016b;Sarwar et al, 2017;Fountas et al, 2018a and2018b;Cai et al, 2018). A discussion on the importance of accounting for group (e.g., region) effects in traffic safety research is provided in Heydari et al, 2016b.…”
Section: Unobserved Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%