2014
DOI: 10.1109/tifs.2013.2291066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growing Grapes in Your Computer to Defend Against Malware

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the only concern is the generated partial logs that result into misclassification. Although, in our case the false alarm rates were significantly low as compared to other existing approaches [6], [20], [30], [40]. This particular limitation is common to the majority of dynamic malware detection approaches.…”
Section: A Generalitycontrasting
confidence: 53%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, the only concern is the generated partial logs that result into misclassification. Although, in our case the false alarm rates were significantly low as compared to other existing approaches [6], [20], [30], [40]. This particular limitation is common to the majority of dynamic malware detection approaches.…”
Section: A Generalitycontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…For this, we may first extract the common subgraph (using graph isomorphism [47]) from all malware and benign samples and then the edges of this subgraph can be removed from all the OSCGs. However, the false alarm rate in our approach is considerably low when compared to approaches [6], [40], and [20] in which the false alarm rate of 10.9%, 9.8% and 9.7% is observed respectively.…”
Section: Detection Accuracymentioning
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the past few decades there are a lot of security research work on the Windows platform in order to enhance its security and protect sensitive data, including malware analysis and detection [3][4][5] and the state-of-the-art vulnerability exploits and mitigations [6][7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%