2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.syapm.2015.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Growth responses of indigenous Frankia populations to edaphic factors in actinorhizal rhizospheres

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Host and nonhost rhizospheres were recently compared with respect to cluster I Frankia strains in one location (34), showing no significant host rhizosphere effect. Cluster III Frankia strains were shown to have a distribution independent of the host rhizophere, implying a broad physiological adaptation in soil (37). The current report is the first comprehensive study showing a significant host plant influence on cluster II Frankia strains in natural soil environments, an effect that is distinct from that of other ecological parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Host and nonhost rhizospheres were recently compared with respect to cluster I Frankia strains in one location (34), showing no significant host rhizosphere effect. Cluster III Frankia strains were shown to have a distribution independent of the host rhizophere, implying a broad physiological adaptation in soil (37). The current report is the first comprehensive study showing a significant host plant influence on cluster II Frankia strains in natural soil environments, an effect that is distinct from that of other ecological parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…in the microbiome was significantly higher in the host-plant-present site, it is still clear that this group of OTUs is quite rare in the microbiome, representing only Ͻ0.05‰ in any sample. This suggests that the host factor is not a source of energy to sustain a large population; i.e., it is not promoting the proliferation of cluster II Frankia outside the host, in contrast to some strains within the cluster I Frankia that can utilize a host-derived soil carbon source (37).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frankiae of clusters 2 and 4 remained undetected, indicating that these populations are either absent or present in numbers below the detection limit. Cluster 1b frankiae have been detected as major populations in several studies, with absolute numbers depending on the sampling depth, physicochemical conditions, and vegetation (15,17,18). These results demonstrated differential effects of environmental conditions, including plant species, carbon resources, and matric potentials on the fate of specific Frankia strains in soil.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…1) that, however, could not be distinguished from subgroup 1a with the primer combinations used in our study (Table 1). Using sequences of the insertion in domain III of the 23S rRNA gene as the target for specific detection and quantification of these subgroups, subgroup 1b was found to be most prominent in many soils from temperate regions (15,17,18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation