Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) in palliative care: Recommendations based on a methodological systematic review

Jünger, Saskia; Payne, Sheila; Brine, Jenny; Radbruch, Lukas; Brearley, Sarah

doi:10.1177/0269216317690685

Cited by 1,098 publications

(1,192 citation statements)

References 67 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

1,161

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Potential other pitfalls are, for example, imposing preconceptions of a problem and not allowing for the contribution of other related perspectives; poor techniques of summarizing and presenting the group responses; not exploring disagreements and; underestimating the demanding nature of a Delphi . A recent systematic review of reports based on the Delphi method found substantial variation in quality as consequence of lack of rigorousness of the application of the process . Ultimately the (new) standard terms are selected on the basis of arguments made transparent.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Critical steps in developing professional standards for the International Continence Society

Rosier

2018

Neurourology and Urodynamics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aims Standardization on the basis of systematic assessment of evidence has become an indispensable element of modern healthcare. International Continence Society (ICS) has initiated and produced extremely well cited standardization documents. The process of standardization is recently depicted in a published manuscript, to keep up with modern society healthcare demands. Methods A narrative review of the ICS history and current state of standardizations for the terms, assessment and the management of patients with lower urinary tract dysfunction. Results This article highlights the philosophy and the historical context of standardization and explains the core elements of modern day standardization. The article also demonstrates the scientific relevance of the ICS standards, on the basis of reference‐counts. Conclusion The history and the relevance of ICS standards are summarized.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Critical steps in developing professional standards for the International Continence Society

Rosier

2018

Neurourology and Urodynamics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The Delphi technique is increasingly becoming an important tool in establishing consensus to address issues in healthcare and health research . In our experience, we found the Delphi framework a simple but effective mechanism for facilitating agreement.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The Delphi technique is an iterative expert consultation and consensus building process that is accepted as relevant evidence in the field of health care and research . This paper follows the proposed standards for Guidance on Conducting and Reporting Delphi Studies (CREDES) …”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Standard baseline data collections in obesity management clinics: A Delphi study with recommendations from an expert panel

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We aimed to develop an expert consensus on standardizing data collections in specialist obesity management clinics in Australia. A panel of 16 experts participated in a structured consensus‐driven Delphi process to reach agreement on a minimum set of baseline patient data collections for consideration in specialist obesity services. The panel included surgeons, clinicians, allied health professionals (dietician, exercise physiologist, psychologist), a bariatric nurse and obesity researchers. We produced a recommended list of core and useful data items that should comprise the baseline patient data set. Consensus was achieved for recommended measures of demographic, anthropometric, biochemical, weight‐loss history, medication, medical history and comorbidity data items using a 70% agreement threshold. In this iterative process, there was also consideration of specific data items for patients referred for bariatric surgery. We present the first expert panel consensus on recommendations for a minimum and standard set of baseline patient data collections in obesity management services in Australia. These may be relevant to other countries with similar obesity management service models. Implementation of these recommendations should facilitate data pooling for clinical audits and research collaborations across clinics seeking to improve the quality of specialist obesity care.

show abstract

“…A Delphi study was conducted with 19 participants from 10 nursing colleges and nine hospitals to explore their altitude to the index system for the qualitative evaluation of undergraduate nursing student innovative ability. A modified recommendation for the Conducting and Reporting of Delphi studies (CREDES) was used to guide this study (Jünger, Payne, Brine, Radbruch, & Brearley, ) (see Appendix S1). A flow chart illustrating the Delphi process is shown in Figure .…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Construction of an index system for qualitative evaluation of undergraduate nursing students innovative ability: A Delphi study

Dai

Wei

Chen

et al. 2019

Journal of Clinical Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim and objective To establish an index system for the evaluation of undergraduate nursing student innovation ability. Background An index system for evaluation of undergraduate nursing student innovation ability has not been established. Design A three‐round Delphi survey sought opinions from experts about the index system for evaluation of undergraduate nursing student innovation ability. Methods A Delphi survey was used for the study of 19 experts from nursing education, clinical nursing and health management. The consistency of consultation results formed the basis for determining the rounds of consultation. With the importance of consulting experts in the last round, we established the judgement matrix using yaahp7.5 software and the analytic hierarchy process and determined the weight coefficient of each index. A modified recommendation for the Conducting and Reporting of Delphi studies (CREDES) was used to guide this study. Results Nineteen experts from 10 nursing colleges and nine third‐level first‐class hospitals in seven domestic provinces/municipalities were included in this study. The index system was divided into primary, secondary and tertiary levels. Consensus was reached on three primary indicators (‘spirit’, ‘ability’ and ‘achievement’), nine secondary indicators and 28 tertiary indicators. Conclusions A unified and hierarchical quality assessment index framework for nursing undergraduate creative ability was established. The framework should be further tested and improved in practice. Relevance to clinical practice Nursing students are the main force behind clinical nursing in the future. An innovative approach to skill acquisition and application could enhance the student nurse experience. The innovative ability of nursing students is important for identification of education strategies that be implemented to better support those individuals. Furthermore, the construction of the index system is helpful for evaluation of the innovation ability of nursing students that are required to better meet the needs of clinical nursing work in the future.

show abstract

Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) in palliative care: Recommendations based on a methodological systematic review

Cited by 1,098 publications

References 67 publications

Critical steps in developing professional standards for the International Continence Society

Critical steps in developing professional standards for the International Continence Society

Standard baseline data collections in obesity management clinics: A Delphi study with recommendations from an expert panel

Construction of an index system for qualitative evaluation of undergraduate nursing students innovative ability: A Delphi study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About